John Bercow has blocked Conservative demands to allow MPs to have a “meaningful vote” on Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal today.
The speaker ruled that “today’s circumstances are the same in substance as Saturday’s” which resulted in another defeat for the PM.
MPs had been summoned back to Westminster on Saturday for the first time since 1982 by Mr Johnson to have a so-called “meaningful vote” on his Brexit deal.
But a majority of them backed an amendment withholding support for the deal until all necessary legislation has been passed into law to avoid a last-minute no-deal.
BREAKING: Commons Speaker John Bercow blocks a bid for a ‘meaningful vote’ on @BorisJohnson‘s #Brexit deal today.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 21, 2019
“Today’s circumstances are the same in substance as Saturday’s,” he says.
Follow live updates here ? https://t.co/OeTiFMEYVD pic.twitter.com/jRW1PoRtGV
Substance and circumstance
Bercow said there were two issues to consider in the ruling and these are of “substance” and “circumstance”.
He said it is “clear” the two motions are in substance the same, and added that while the government might argue there is a change of circumstance – because the PM has now requested a Brexit delay – that is “not persuasive” as the application is part of a process.
Therefore, the motion is “in substance” the same as Saturday’s and the circumstances are “in substance” the same as well.
Meaningful vote
Mr Johnson abandoned plans for a meaningful vote on Saturday when MPs backed a move forcing him to ask Brussels for a further delay.
Downing Street also said it would pull Monday’s vote if any amendments are selected which would “render the vote pointless”.
“There is no point having a meaningless vote – the Government would pull the motion. We will go ahead with the introduction of the WAB with second reading tomorrow,” the PM’s official spokesman said.”
It came after Chief Secretary to the Treasury Rishi Sunak denied that trying to bring the deal back for a vote was a bid to portray Parliament as being obstructive.
“It was an observation on the deal happening and I think what people need is a substantive vote,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“I think people are crying out to see that and they would find it odd if, because of some technical procedural device, we weren’t able to have that vote.”
Related: Labour poised to table amendment calling for a referendum next week
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
