• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News Media

Right-wing TV audiences much more likely to ignore Covid-19 restrictions

“This study has many policy implications for the future progression of COVID-19 and health messaging in general. In a highly partisan environment, false information can be easily disseminated.”

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2020-10-09 09:55
in Media, News
Credit;PA

Credit;PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Right-wing television audiences are much more likely to ignore Covid-19 restrictions, according to a new study.

Viewers of channels such as Fox News could pose higher risks of spreading Covid-19 because they are less inclined to self-quarantine, social distance and wear masks, suggests The BMJ study.

Conservative media outlets in the US have faced criticism for their biased health messaging during the pandemic and for consistently downplaying the virus’ danger, according to the researchers.

The team suspects such political bias may explain the behavioural differences they observed and added that public health messaging is “doomed to fail” if media channels continue to cover coronavirus politically.

Ideology

Erfei Zhao, a doctoral researcher at the University of Southern California, US, said: “Specifically, republican ideology has long been centred around the idea of individualism and an emphasis on personal freedom.

“Therefore, it is possible that people who trust Fox naturally prefer a more ‘hands-off’ approach and are more likely to refuse strict health policies such as self-quarantining and social distancing.”

The study, published by the online journal BMJ Global Health, underlined the media’s key role in disseminating health information and shaping viewers’ behaviour.

Mr Zhao added: “Health messaging, despite being one of the few effective ways to slow down the spread of the virus in the absence of a vaccine, is doomed to fail if the media prioritise political interests over population health.”

To probe the link between media bias and health behaviours, the researchers studied whether treatment of Coronavirus restrictions differed according to viewer’s trust in left-or right-wing TV media.

RelatedPosts

Rishi Sunak ‘planning A-level reform to establish British Baccalaureate’

John Bercow ‘to star in new series of The Traitors US’

Martin Lewis issues ‘urgent savers warning’ as Bank of England base rate is held

Labour accuses Government of being ‘complicit’ in trophy trade

They drew on data from an online survey, which began in March this year and included several follow up waves of questioning later in the year. More than 4800 adults living independently in the US completed the surveys.

Participants were asked about behaviours over the past week such as hand-washing, the use of face coverings, and risky actions including whether they went to bars or clubs, attended large gatherings or visited other people’s homes.

They were also asked how much they trusted 18 media sources for information on COVID-19, with a particular focus on the left wing CNN and the right wing Fox News, the two largest news outlets in the US.

Participants were also presented with 20 other information sources and asked which they used.

The alternatives included professional bodies, social and traditional media, friends, family, colleagues, and the White House.

Just under a third (29 per cent) said they trusted CNN more than Fox, about half, (52 per cent) expressed no preference, and a fifth (20 per cent) said they trusted Fox more than CNN.

On average, respondents said they had used around three professional sources and around six other diverse sources to learn about the Coronavirus in the preceding week.

CNN

The researchers found that people who trusted CNN were more likely to engage in preventive behaviours, such as hand washing, and less likely to report risky behaviours, compared to those who trusted Fox News.

Marked on a scale of zero to five, with five denoting the most preventative behaviours, Fox News devotees scored an average of 3.41, while people who trusted CNN more than Fox News scored 3.85.

Fox News devotees also practised an average of 1.25 risky behaviours, while CNN fans engaged in 0.94 risky behaviours.

The team also found that health behaviours changed significantly over time, with people initially acting more cautiously, before they relaxed as the pandemic unfolded.

But once again, these changes varied by media preference, with the speed of change much faster among those who preferred Fox News.

Fox News followers consistently practised fewer preventive and more risky behaviours during waves 1 to 5, compared with those who trusted CNN more.

Those who expressed no media preferences adhered more to Covid-19 guidelines than those who trusted Fox News more, during the last two survey waves.

But compared to CNN supporters, the media-neutral participants consistently showed significantly fewer preventive and more risky behaviours throughout the survey period.

Behaviours

Among the most likely to practise preventive behaviours were people aged 65 and above, women, those of non-Hispanic or Asian ethnic backgrounds and the most educated.

Those with a job, but who were unable to work from home, were least likely to follow the rules.

In addition, participants who sourced their information from more sources were linked to fewer risky behaviours, who drew from a narrow range.

The researchers stressed that, due to uncertain causes, people’s behaviours may be influenced primarily by their personal politics. Media, therefore, could be a proxy for political preference instead of a source of information.

Despite that, Mr Zhao concluded: “This study has many policy implications for the future progression of COVID-19 and health messaging in general. In a highly partisan environment, false information can be easily disseminated.”

Related: Reaction to “revolving door” appointment of Allegra Stratton as new press secretary

Previous Post

Flashback to when Downing Street’s new press sec “humiliated” single mother over benefit payments

Next Post

“Tin-eared” Commons watchdog approves £3,300 pay rise for MPs

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

More from TLE

New changes could put an end to false statements being made in Parliament

Rishi Sunak mulling over watering down net zero commitments – report

Flashback: To Bob Geldof’s famous foul-mouthed exchange with Russell Brand

Tory Lee Anderson found to have broke MPs’ code

Russell Brand accused of rape, sexual assaults and emotional abuse

Diane Abbott launches attack on Starmer and Labour over race complaint handling

Hotel Review: Four Seasons, Baku, Azerbaijan

Road Tripping Across the Strait: Preparations for a Moroccan Adventure

Braverman blasted after Neo-Nazi ‘banned from Germany’ allowed to enter UK

Rishi Sunak ‘planning A-level reform to establish British Baccalaureate’

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




-->