Boris Johnson may refuse to appear before the London Assembly to explain his failure to disclose his relationship to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri who benefitted from large financial grants and foreign tax-payer funded missions with Johnson, the Tory Party chairman has hinted.
James Cleverly said it was the job of Parliament to hold the Prime Minister to account, not the London Assembly.
Members of the Assembly on Tuesday gave the PM a two-week deadline to provide “details and a timeline of all contact with Jennifer Arcuri including social, personal and professional during his period of office as mayor of London”.
Refusing to comply could see the Conservative leader formally summoned by City Hall and in breach of the law.
A three-month prison sentence can be slapped on those who disobey a summons from the Assembly.
“Everything was done with complete propriety”
The Sunday Times revealed that Ms Arcuri, an American who moved to London seven years ago, was given £126,000 in public money and was treated to privileged access to three foreign trade missions led by Johnson while he was mayor of London.
The PM has repeatedly refused to clarify the nature of his relationship with the woman whose Shoreditch home he reportedly used “afternoon breaks in his mayoral diary” to pop over to, while married to second wife Marina Wheeler, mother to four of his five children.
Harder to explain for Johnson, is why his equally reticent pal’s business received £10,000 in sponsorship from an organisation overseen by him as mayor in 2013, with no conflicts of interest declared by him.
A further £15,000 was said to have come in 2014 and a £100,000 grant from the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport earlier this year.
But Johnson has repeatedly refused to answer questions about any of this, only saying “everything was done with complete propriety” but declined to clarify the nature of his relationship with Ms Arcuri, 34.
Jail terms for dodging the London Assembly
Johnson, who stood down as mayor in 2016, appeared before the London Assembly last year to answer questions about his costly Garden Bridge debacle, while he was foreign secretary.
The Greater London Authority Act 1999 gives the Assembly the power to call for evidence from a previous mayor up to eight years after their tenure, with fines and jail terms possible punishments for those refusing to comply.
Yet James Cleverly, who previously served on the London Assembly, poured doubt on whether the PM would comply with the Assembly’s demands for information.
“The London Assembly’s job is to scrutinise the mayor of London, and in that capacity they need to focus on the failings and ineptitude of the current mayor,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“When I was on the London Assembly, it was quite common for Government ministers to refuse to appear.
“The body that exists to scrutinise ministers is the House of Commons, the body that exists to scrutinise the mayor of London is the London Assembly, and there is a clear division and role there.”
When told the PM could be in breach of the law for failing to explain himself, Cleverly replied: “That’s not my understanding. I’m willing to look into it.”
Arcuri grant frozen
The Government has frozen a £100,000 grant to Ms Arcuri’s company, Hacker House, and is facing embarrassing questions about the verification process carried about before awarding the money.
Digital Minister Matt Warman said his department had done the “usual due diligence” and that the company had a British phone number.
Yet numerous reports said calls to the number were directed to an office in California, where American Jennifer Arcuri is thought to be based.
Matt Warman said: “This is a company that is based in Britain as far as Companies House is concerned. It is a company with a British phone number.
“We will review that, but we have no reason to think that there is anything untoward in this particular matter.”
Almost half the money awarded has already been handed to the training outfit.
READ MORE: Can Boris Johnson explain why ex-model chum Jennifer Arcuri got taxpayer cash & why Thomas Cook didn’t?
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .