A new study had revealed that Government sanctions on benefit claimants have negative outcomes.
The study of welfare conditionality discovered that the threat of sanctions, or the actual introduction of benefit cuts, did not help people get into work.
The studies main finding is that “Benefit sanctions do little to enhance people’s motivation to prepare for, seek or enter paid work. They routinely trigger profoundly negative personal, financial, health and behavioural outcomes.”
They tracked hundreds of claimants on their journey under the Government rules and were not impressed with their outcomes.
Sanctions generally delivered poor outcomes, including debt, poverty and reliance on charities such as food banks they discovered. It appears that taking away benefits, pushes these vulnerable people further into poverty, rather than shock them into work.
“Furthermore, the stress and material hardship caused by sanctions were perceived as undermining the ability to look for work both during and after the sanction” the report reveals.
Claimants were quoted multiple times in the document including:
“ No, [Jobcentre Plus is not encouraging] at all. They just basically say, ‘Right, here’s your book, get it done. If you don’t; I’ll sanction you.” (FEMALE JOBSEEKER, SCOTLAND)
“ Big brother is watching you! You’re getting spied on.” (FEMALE JOBSEEKER, SCOTLAND)
“I’ve never been sanctioned for a fair reason.” (MALE JOBSEEKER, ENGLAND)
“ What, by sanctioning me and cutting down on my money obviously leaves me less money to live on and if I’ve got less money to live on I can’t go for these job interviews, I can’t put credit on my phone to phone for jobs.” (MALE JOBSEEKER, ENGLAND)
The Economic and Social Research Council-funded welfare conditionality study was carried out between 2013 and 2018 by researchers at six universities.
A DWP spokesperson said: “Our research shows that over 70% of JSA claimants say sanctions make it more likely they will comply with reasonable and agreed requirements, and it is understandable that people meet certain expectations in return for benefits.
“We tailor requirements to individual cases and sanctions are only used in a very small percentage of cases when people fail to meet their agreed requirements set out in their claimant commitment.”
Woman has heart attack DURING job centre meeting but too scared to leave as feared losing benefits
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
