The Conservatives have been reeling from revelations that Amazon has not paid a penny for National Health Service data handed over to the internet giant, which the Tories have also protected from having to pay more tax revenues to the UK public coffers.
– A scandal they are keen to avoid before the general election with mounting questions about their competency looking after the overstretched National Health Service. Record waiting times have been rocketing up ever since the coalition took power in 2010 and hospitals started closing rather than opening. And, more recently, a dossier of official records revealed by Jeremy Corbyn showed details of discussions over US companies being allowed to charge more for medication and health services.
The Government has now been accused of breaching EU rules by allowing Amazon to have access to the NHS patient data for free.
A letter, seen by the Press Association, shows that a formal complaint has been lodged with the EU Commission, claiming that the arrangement is “excessive” for the reasons Amazon has given for using the information.
Joylon Maugham QC, a prominent anti-Brexit campaigner and founder of the Good Law Project, wrote the letter which was sent on Wednesday, claiming the tech giant should have paid for access.
He said: “We know from secret recordings that the Government lent on the tax authorities to go easy on Amazon. It now looks like it is also giving Amazon – worldwide, forever, irrevocably and royalty-free – a licence to all of the NHS’s healthcare information.
“Amazon gets a leg up in the hugely valuable healthcare sector. But what’s in it for us? Our Government should have charged Amazon for the data but it didn’t. I’m making this complaint so that the EU Commission forces Amazon to pay up.”
EU state aid rules say governments must not give away public assets without approval from the Commission for anything worth more than 200,000 euros (£168,600) over three years. Campaigners claim the value of the NHS information is far higher.
Both Amazon and NHS England insist that the data is freely available and used by other organisations, with no private information on patients being provided.
But George Peretz QC, a barrister at Monckton Chambers in London, specialising in EU, VAT, state aid, competition and customs law, said the Government had questions to answer.
He told the Press Association: “The general principle is if the Government lets a private company use public assets free of charge – that’s state aid. Normally, if there are assets that are useful and help the private company make money, the Government should charge for it – whether it’s land, intellectual property or, in this case, data.
“You’d expect that if any operator that has a lot of very valuable data – let’s say a bank – entered into an arrangement with Amazon to provide it with data, you’d expect Amazon to pay for it.”
Amazon first announced it had teamed up with the NHS over the summer, when it launched a health service on its Alexa voice-controlled home assistants.
But earlier this month a redacted copy of the contract was released to the Privacy International charity, which states Amazon can access information on symptoms, causes and definitions of conditions, and “all related copyrightable content and data and other materials”.
The contract also states that the company can use the information to sell “new products, applications, cloud-based services and/or distributed software”, which can be shared with third parties.
But the filing by Mr Maugham says: “The licensing of the data goes far beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective. It is excessive.”
NHS England and Amazon insist that the data is already freely available and used by 1,500 organisations – primarily local authorities and other public bodies – although the deal with the tech giant is one of the largest.
An Amazon spokeswoman said: “We are confident that our agreement with NHS is fully in line with UK and EU rules.
“It is a licence to use content from the NHS website, which is already freely accessible to the public.
“We don’t have the details of this complaint though we would stress that, Alexa does not have access to any personal or private information from the NHS.”
The Department of Health declined to comment.
NHS England said: “No patient data is being provided to this company by the NHS, which takes data privacy extremely seriously and has put appropriate safeguards in place to ensure information is used correctly.”
READ MORE: Amazon pay £1 million corporation tax – despite turnover of more than £2.3 billion
Labour warn Tory NHS crisis hits patient safety with over 4,600 deaths down to patient safety
NHS ‘imploding’ as figures reveal worst ever A&E performance and scale of deterioration under Tories
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
