• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Why does austerity only apply to the least well off?

In an age of severe austerity, why don't the well-off feel the pinch as much as the least well-off?

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
2019-06-25 11:32
in Opinion
Credit; Steve Parsons/PA Wire

Credit; Steve Parsons/PA Wire

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

It only took one word last year to describe why I wouldn’t be watching the Royal Wedding; inequality.

As the blushing bride was paraded through Windsor in a dress that cost more than £100,000 she passed spots usually occupied by homeless people who struggle to scrape together a single pound at the best of times.

A further £90,000 was paid for 20 silver-plated trumpets announcing the event as thousands of other families struggle to put food on the table. And £50,000 was splashed on a lemon elderflower cake bought from Violet Bakery in East London despite Britain being home to a growing number of food bank users.

And now taxpayers will have to swallow £2.4 million to renovate the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s home which is in need of urgent repairs, it has been claimed. Frogmore Cottage in Windsor has been turned into a single property from five separate homes and now needs sprucing up.

It comes as the Queen’s Sovereign Grant from the Treasury was £82 million in 2018-19, with £33 million set aside for maintenance, including major work on Buckingham Palace. Excluding money transferred to reserves for future building work at the palace, the Queen’s official expenses last year were £67 million, a 41 per cent year-on-year increase, the figures show.

It begs the question, therefore, that in an age of severe austerity, why is it that the well-off don’t feel the pinch as much as the least well-off?

This year the UK hosted the UN’s expert on poverty and human rights who concluded that the results of the austerity experiment are “crystal clear”. In a statement he said:

“There are 14 million people living in poverty, record levels of hunger and homelessness, falling life expectancy for some groups, ever fewer community services, and greatly reduced policing, while access to the courts for lower-income groups has been dramatically rolled back by cuts to legal aid.

“The imposition of austerity was an ideological project designed to radically reshape the relationship between the Government and the citizenry. UK standards of well-being have descended precipitately in a remarkably short period of time, as a result of deliberate policy choices made when many other options were available.”

RelatedPosts

Gary Lineker is a national treasure 

The Home Office’s Challenge: Balancing Immigration, Security and Technology

Knife Crime: ‘The Tough Thing to Do Is to Take on the Complexity’

That’s All, Folks

Pretty damning stuff, yet things are unlikely to change anytime soon. Just 14 MPs turned up to discuss a report on 14 million people living in poverty, and Boris Johnson – the leading contender to become our next Prime Minister- has already promised tax breaks to the wealthy.

It seems in the UK austerity only applies to the least well off. The biggest cuts left for those most in need. Shameful really, but it’s all for Queen and country.

Tags: headline
Please login to join discussion

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← TV star Ben Fogle backs calls for more research into controversial kelp harvesting plan ← Thug who robbed man as he lay dying in street facing life in jail after being convicted of murder
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->