When toxins are released into the environment by any other industry, or cancerogenic, endocrine disrupting fumes detected in public buildings, trained professionals in hazmat suits instantly crawl all over the hastily closed-off sites in question, testing the air taking samples with specialised equipment.
Not so in aviation. Toxic gas-type fume emissions occur daily in aircraft.
This kind of scenario is happening regularly worldwide and is the aviation industry’s sore spot.
Escaping engine oil fumes can cause pilots and cabin crews to become incapacitated and unable to function. Increasingly passengers are also overcome by these physically harmful noxious fumes.
The rise in incidences is a worrying indictment of airlines’ safety procedures and required maintenance protocols of their aircraft, not to mention the pressure they put on their employees to ignore and not report.
The aviation industry seems to think it is safe and acceptable to breathe these harmful fumes in a confined, sealed space.
It is not.
Toxic fumes
The health-damaging toxic fumes from heated jet oil or hydraulic fluids are hazardous to human health.
Seals that leak by design and filters that are not filtering adequately, plus non-existant warning systems to alert the pilots of Carbon monoxide (CO) in the air, are the problem. Carbon monoxide is a product from a combination of several hundred pyrolyzed neurotoxic substances used in the engine fluids. CO is dangerous, deadly, and often odour-less. “Smells” and “odours” develop from other chemical reactions in the mix.
Belgian researchers have indicated in recent findings that the exposure to certain substances in the toxic fumes that are present at an alarmingly high level in the cabin air could cause permanent brain damage in pilots and cabin crew.
Frequent flyers who fly often might be in as much danger.
Regulators and governments ignore the magnitude of warnings or are slow to react. Professional organisations and expert individuals have been highlighting this very real problem for decades – over sixty years to be exact.
The danger of pilot incapacitation as a result of gas in the cockpit breathing air is a real health and safety issue, that can put the lives of hundreds of passengers on the line on any given flight.
First warnings were issued in 1939 by American Captain Harry G. Armstrong M.D., from the Medical Corps Aero Medical Research Laboratory in the Air Corps Material Division.
Is it that the regulators and government are protecting their customers – the airline industry?
Despite alert circulars sent out by, for example, the Federal Aviation Administration, last in 2018, stating that “odors, smoke, and fumes “may be” introduced to the cabin atmosphere as a result of aircraft equipment malfunction/failure or by inadvertent or intentional actions,” nothing is happening.
Lawsuits
The included recommendations that the International Civil Aviation Organization Document 9481 “should be reviewed” is ignored, or delayed by bureaucratic inaction.
In an October 2007 leaked internal email a worried Boeing engineer stated: “We are looking for tombstones. Before anyone with horsepower will do anything about it (toxic fumes), a disaster has to happen”.
He complained that he and other engineers had been given the “run around” over their fears.
The aviation industry’s mantra – “the wellbeing of our customers is our highest priority“ – becomes obsolete in the face of the right to healthy indoor air for aircrew and passengers.
Legal proceedings worldwide by crew and passengers on the grounds that they are ill from toxic fumes containing carbon monoxide and other health hazardous substances are on the rise.
Can pilots fly millions of trusting passengers to their destinations safely and can cabin crews who have to be fit in the face of a possible emergency save an aircraft if they are knocked out by toxic fumes before they realise there is an emergency? Hardly.
What is at stake?
The health, safety, and wellbeing of all living souls onboard aircraft are at stake. Incidents can happen anytime, anywhere.
Will the industry continue to offer essential, but according to them “optional,“ safety features at exorbitant prices as they have been doing in the past? What will be the lessons of B737-Max?
Simply put: is a crash because both pilots become incapacitated at the same time needed before those with enough “horsepower“ will get into gear and do something?
By Bearnairdine Beaumont
In her new book TOMB IN THE SKY, a sequel to THE AIR I BREATHE – IT’S CLASSIFIED published in 2016, fumes related ill-health medically retired author Bearnairdine Beaumont, former Chief Purser describes her career and shares insider experiences.
Resources:
Principles and Practice – Aviation Medicine – 1939 – Harry G. Armstrong, Medical Corps, Aero Medical Research Laboratory, Air Corps Material Division ).
Boeing Airplane Company – 1953 Air Contamination Problem
The
Right to Healthy Indoor Air – WHO http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/117316/E69828.pdf?ua=1
Internal Boeing email https://www.aerotoxicteam.com/uploads/6/0/3/8/6038702/boeing_engineer_tombstone.pdf
BMJ-Journal:“Aerotoxic Syndrome: A New Occupational Disease?”(adverse health effects experienced by aircrew exposed to aircraft contaminated air)
Aircraft Air Quality Malfunction Incidents: Causation, Regulatory, Reporting and Rates
Human Intoxication Following Inhalation Exposure to Synthetic Jet Lubricating Oil – 1977
More science, evidence, investigative documentaries and testimonies can be found here: AEROTOXIC TEAM & International Partners at www.aerotoxicteam.com
MORE:
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
