• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • FAQ
  • Meet the Team
  • About The London Economic
  • Advertise
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Face mask palaver continues as Justice Secretary says they should ‘perhaps’ become mandatory

Labour has demanded “clarity” on the Government’s position and has requested that Health Secretary Matt Hancock come to the Commons on Monday to provide Parliament with a “clear message”.

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
July 13, 2020
in Politics

A Cabinet minister has provoked further confusion about the wearing of face coverings after declaring he would “perhaps” support making them mandatory when in public.

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, asked on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme whether he was in the “mandatory perhaps” or “mandatory never” camp in terms of insisting people don face coverings, said: “I think I’m ‘mandatory perhaps’.”

Speaking on Friday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson hinted non-surgical masks could become compulsory in shops, saying he wanted to be “stricter” on insisting people wear them.

But Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove said on Sunday it was “best to trust people’s common sense” rather than force them to adopt face coverings.

Friday: PM – we need to be stricter on face masks

Sunday: Michael Gove – masks won't be made mandatory in shops

This pandemic is far from over, but our response is once again behind the rest of the world.

The Govt need to get their act together. #Marrhttps://t.co/zhvKsoPYJD

— Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) July 12, 2020

Clarity

Quizzed on the different responses and whether they signalled a split in opinion at the top of Government, Mr Buckland told the BBC: “He (Mr Gove) took the view as he was answering the question that he thought we should encourage good sense – I agree with that.

“If it becomes necessary to nudge people further by taking further action then of course we will consider that.

“I think the matter is under careful and daily review.”

RelatedPosts

Furious public oppose 1% pay offer to nurses, poll reveals

Sunak’s Budget makes new nurses £300 poorer, Labour says

Ex-minister says it’s ‘morally wrong’ to cut NHS pay as Tory rebellion brews

One per cent pay rise half of what staff were promised, NHS trusts claim

Labour has demanded “clarity” on the Government’s position and has requested that Health Secretary Matt Hancock come to the Commons on Monday to provide Parliament with a “clear message”.

Shadow health minister Justin Madders told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour: “We need Matt Hancock to come to the House and say this is what the science says, this is what we believe you should be doing and then let’s move on.

“Have a clear message and we all know where we stand.”

Scotland

The call for ministers to make face coverings mandatory in shops in England has been growing following First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s decision to change the rule in Scotland as of Friday.

Dr Venki Ramakrishnan, president of the Royal Society, told Good Morning Britain that the evidence on face coverings had “shifted”.

From both anecdotal feedback and my own observation from a quick visit to a couple of shops earlier, making face coverings mandatory has resulted in close to 100% compliance. Well done, Scotland – let’s keep it up.

— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) July 12, 2020

The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) member said: “It’s (evidence) now quite strongly in favour of using face coverings in enclosed spaces where we’re likely to come into contact with strangers.

“I think that the Government should be very clear. It’s not consistent to make it mandatory on public transport and not make it mandatory in other enclosed and busy public spaces because the behaviour of the virus is the same in all of these spaces.”

James Daunt, managing director of Waterstones book stores, said asking customers to wear a face covering was a “reasonable measure”.

When asked if the policy could boost shopper confidence, he told the Today programme: “I don’t think it is a huge factor, but I also think if it reassures people, then it is a perfectly reasonable measure to take.”

But he said staff working across his chain of stores would not be asked to “police” the wearing of coverings.

Mr Daunt added: “There will be a tiny, tiny minority of people who will be confrontational over it and it is not the position of shop workers to enter into that situation.

“We shouldn’t put ourselves in confrontational positions, but I think we can, as retailers, if we are requested to do so, clearly tell everybody it is a sensible thing to do.”

Related: Post-Brexit FTA could give Turks special status when UK implements new migration rules

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Tags: headline
Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending fromTLE

  • All
  • trending

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

Stress, fear and homelessness: The threat looming over families confronted with eviction

File photo dated 07/11/03 of a prison cell.

The Other Prison Pandemic

Latest from TLE

Furious public oppose 1% pay offer to nurses, poll reveals

Credit;PA

Sunak’s Budget makes new nurses £300 poorer, Labour says

Lucky Numbers and Horoscopes for today, 7 March 2021

thunder ball results

Thunder Ball Results, Saturday 6th March 2021

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: jack@thelondoneconomic.com

Commercial enquiries, please contact: advertise@thelondoneconomic.com

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech & Auto
  • About The London Economic
  • Meet the Team
  • Privacy policy

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.