• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

BP extracted over £15bn worth of Iraqi oil after British invasion

BP's oil operations in Iraq have created 262 million barrels of oil representing £15.4 billion since 2011.

Bill Curtis by Bill Curtis
2024-10-06 18:36
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Despite officials in the UK confirming that oil was not one of the reasons for the Iraq war, BP has profited a staggering £15.4 billion from Iraqi oil, a 2023 report by Declassified revealed. The investigation revealed that BP started producing oil in Iraq for the first time in almost forty years after the conflict was declared illegal by the United Nations.

The invasion, which began in March 2003, resulted in a “catastrophic humanitarian situation” in which close to 655,000 Iraqi deaths were documented within the first three years equalling 2.5 per cent of the population.

Many critics consequently saw the war as a war for oil, as Iraq has the world’s fifth-largest proven oil reserves, and, they believe, it wasn’t a part of the United States’ “War on Terror.”

Data regarding the oil production of BP in post-invasion Iraq has been inferred from the company’s annual reports using the average annual barrel price for each year of production. From 2011-2022, BP extracted a total of 262 million barrels of oil from the state of Iraq.

In 2011 it started to produce oil at a rate of 31,000 barrels of Iraqi oil per day, reaching 123,000 barrels per day in 2015. By 2020, BP’s Iraqi output topped the combined production in all its European operations including the North Sea.

During the Bush administration, the US considered a new oil law that would have provided a form of indirect privatisation of Iraq’s oil through PSAs. These agreements would permit foreign companies to contract with the government to develop certain parts of Iraq’s oil sector in return for a share of the profits. However, due to internal political dynamics, the Iraqi parliament was unable to push the law through.

Instead, the Iraqi government used an alternative method which permitted only technical service contracts (TSC). In those, the ownership of oil remained with Iraq, but foreign companies received a flat service fee. For example, BP invested in the Rumaila field on a TSC basis, which became effective in December 2009, under which it was paid cost recovery irrespective of the price of oil. The company also earned a fixed fee per barrel.

The Rumaila development project was operated by BP, which originally held a 38 per cent working interest, 37 per cent belonged to the China National Petroleum Company (CNPC), and the remaining 25 per cent was held by the government of Iraq. After the first year, BP took a 48 per cent share and extended the development by five years to 2034.

The term “Blair Petroleum” was frequently used as a joke in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq to show the close relationship between BP and Tony Blair’s government. 

RelatedPosts

Robert Jenrick joins migrant hotel protest – and gets reminded of his role in opening them

Zack Polanski dismantles millionaire in wealth tax debate live on TV

Nigel ‘keep politics out of football’ Farage launches football club

Donald Trump rules out Ukraine getting Crimea back or joining NATO

Related: Elon Musk appearance at Trump rally labelled ‘cringiest’ moment in US polical history

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Cuttlefish bolognese and razor clam prawn toast among ‘unsung species’ being celebrated at Rick Stein restaurants ← Restaurant review: The Chinese Cricket Club, Blackfriars
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->