• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

In times of crisis, I will continue to be another angry voice

The convenient taboo of talking about the dead is creating rigid political conformity.

Guest Contributor by Guest Contributor
2020-04-28 13:18
in Opinion
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

By Thomas G. Clark (Another Angry Voice)

The United Kingdom is suffering one of the worst coronavirus outbreaks in the world, with the official figures admitting over 20,000 Covid-19 deaths. Research based on figures from the Office for National Statistics suggest that the real total is likely more than double once deaths in care homes and the community have finally been counted.

It is widely considered acceptable to talk about the official death rate and to mourn specific individuals who have died in the pandemic, especially front line NHS staff who have fallen in the fight, but once anyone begins asking questions about why the death rate is so high in the UK compared to other nations, the push back is vehement.

The moment efforts are made to establish a cause, the moralising ”how very dare you politicise the crisis?” brigade immediately show up in droves in order to deter any thought processes that may lead back to the party of government or the Westminster political establishment bearing any responsibility whatever.

Decades of wanton self-defeating austerity cuts

The decade of wanton self-defeating austerity cuts to the NHS and social care system; the multiple ignored warnings to stock more protective gear for medical workers; Boris Johnson’s bizarre ‘Superman of Capitalism’ delusion that led him to believe he would actually be lauded for bravely ignoring the World Health Organisation pandemic protocol (test, trace, isolate) unlike all those lilly-livered and weak-willed foreigners who actually acted to combat the spread; the weeks of indolent foot-dragging over the introduction of shutdown measures in the crucial early stages of the outbreak; the glacially slow expansion of Covid-19 testing capacity; the lamentable failure to prevent the virus ravaging care homes full of the most vulnerable people; the deliberate politicisation of the science by embedding Johnson’s tyrannical political henchman into the supposedly-independent scientific advisory group …

Dare to suggest that any of this stuff may have exacerbated Britain’s coronavirus crisis and you’ll be immediately shouted down by the faux-outrage “don’t politicise” mob, as if attempting to establish causal factors is akin to urinating on the corpses of the recently deceased.

Political taboo

These efforts to establish a political taboo about discussing what caused people to die isn’t a new thing, with numerous other examples in recent political history.

In November 2017 the British Medical Journal published a research paper linking an estimated 120,000 excess deaths since 2010 to Tory austerity cuts to the NHS and social care system, and in June 2019 the IPPR published a similar calculation estimating around 130,000 austerity-related excess deaths between 2012 and 2019.

The reaction to both of these studies has ranged from the BBC’s decision to ban their reporters from covering the first study, to increasingly hysterical efforts to portray the idea that austerity kills as outrageous and outlandish “fake news”.

Anyone sane would admit that it’s beyond obvious that there’s a price to be paid in human lives for slashing tens of billions from the NHS and social care budgets, closing scores of NHS facilities all over the country, creating a shortfall of 100,000 NHS workers, and causing the longest waiting times since records began.

But the likes of the Daily Mail and right-wing Labour saboteur MP Neil Coyle are working hard to create the narrative that attempts to highlight these excess deaths are some kind of sickening moral outrage.

Establishing the cause

It’s the same pattern: Vast numbers of people dying unnecessarily is fine, attempting to establish the cause of these excess deaths is the horrifying moral outrage. 

Another example occurred after the barbaric Manchester Arena bombing, which left 22 people dead after an Islamist extremist who had been terrorist training in Libya and Syria came back through the UK border to launch a sickening attack on a crowd of innocent people.

This atrocity was one of the pivotal moments in the 2017 General Election campaign, and the faux-outrage brigade were out in force again, decrying anyone who dared to consider the causal factors instead of uncritically treating the attack as some kind of inexplicable and entirely unpredictable horror that occurred completely out of the blue.

Emotionally charged condemnation was hurled at transgressors who pointed out the link between terrorist attacks in Europe and imperialist western foreign policy that led to the creation of vast lawless terrorism breeding grounds in Libya and Iraq/Syria.

How did the terrorist manage to make it through the UK border, despite the fact that the security services knew that he had been hanging out with terrorists, and that he was actively planning a terrorist attack? Did it have anything to do with the huge Tory austerity cuts to UK Border Force funding and staffing since 2010?

Unanswered questions

Questions like this went unanswered because just asking them was treated like some kind of unthinkable taboo to be instantly shouted down with hysterical rhetoric, rather than the first crucial steps in avoiding similar atrocities in the future.

There’s definitely a pattern, and it’s an extremely convenient pattern for the ruling establishment class isn’t it?

There’s a concerted effort to engineer a perception that the socially accepted behaviour is to address tragedies in an uncritical manner. It’s fine to express emotions like sadness and anger. It’s fine to express sympathy with the victims and their families. And it’s fine to cry out “how could this have happened?” but only if question is purely rhetorical.

Anyone who actually attempts to answer the question is treated as a degenerate social transgressor, and bombarded with emotionally manipulative accusations of “politicisation”, as if discussing the political aspects of a significant event is some kind of unacceptable wickedness.

Don’t politicise

The strangest aspect of all is the unthinking hypocrisy of those who attempt to emotionally bully others into silence. After all what could be more political than seeking to silence the political opinions of others, purely because you don’t like the questions they’re asking and the conclusions they’re coming to?

In the end “don’t politicise” is just a cry for rigid political conformity using the most powerful political weapon of all; emotional manipulation.
 
 

RelatedPosts

Elevenses: The Tractor War

‘Scam’ Cryptocurrencies and the ’looking glass’ world of finance

Elevenses: Stick It To The Politicians

If the local elections tell us anything, it’s that our democracy desperately needs a kiss of life

Please login to join discussion

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

Mane plays down spat with Salah as Liverpool boss battles to stay in cup

Confidential documents reveal how China mass detention camps work

Weather forecast, alerts and UVB index for London, Friday 18 December 2020

London funder awards over £4m to 51 charities changing lives and tackling inequality

BBGI SICAV invests in five Canadian PPP Projects with first offer agreement

‘Too early’ to book summer breaks, PM says – but Hancock has already booked Cornwall getaway

Watch: Pack of dogs chase deer and tear it to pieces during Boxing Day hunt

Nadine Dorries asked if her tweets would break her own online safety legislation

Breathing low levels of toxic air pollution causes changes similar to early stages of heart failure

Thousands complain to Ofcom over BLM dance on Britain’s Got Talent

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.