• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News Education

Teachers criticise new assessments for four-year-olds

The new Reception Baseline Assessment will be rolled out across all primary schools from September.

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2020-02-26 14:26
in Education, News
Credit;PA

Credit;PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A teachers’ union has criticised the Government’s decision to replace Key Stage 1 SATs with a new one-on-one assessment system for reception-age primary school pupils.

The Reception Baseline Assessment (RBA) will be rolled out across all primary schools from September this year, the Department of Education (DoE) said on Wednesday.

The 20-minute assessment with a teacher is supposed to be carried out within six weeks of the new term and is designed to provide a starting point by which to measure children’s progress.

The Key Stage 1 SATs, which take place in Year 2, when pupils are aged six and seven, are due to be discontinued from 2022/2023.

School Standards Minister Nick Gibb said: “It is hugely important that we understand how much progress primary schools help their pupils make.

“This new teacher-led check will replace the SATs taken at the end of Year 2 to give a better understanding of a child’s starting point when they arrive at school and reduce the number of assessments in primary schools overall.”

The assessment covers literacy, communication, language, maths and knowledge appropriate to age and development of children at the start of reception, the DoE said.

National Education Union

But the National Education Union (NEU) said it is concerned that the new testing will be too stressful for four-year-olds and time-consuming for teachers.

Research among its members who participated in a pilot found that 80% did not think the RBA was an accurate indication of attainment, and 85% preferred their individual school’s method of testing.

RelatedPosts

UKIP pledge to deport Bob Vylan and everyone says the same thing

James O’Brien perfectly sums up Glastonbury controversy

Police launch criminal investigation into Kneecap and Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury performances

Bob Vylan have US visas revoked after controversial Glastonbury set

It found that many thought the new testing was just a “tick-box” exercise, and 69% said it had not helped them develop positive relationships with pupils.

The NEU said: “The Government presents the test as brief and ‘light touch’, but in reality it consumes teacher time and interferes with the settling-in period so important to children’s first experience of school.”

One teacher said: “Settling new children is a fine art and is not a time that can be disrupted by unnecessary tests.”

The NEU said 83% of teachers believed the RBA increased their workload and many had to carry out the tests in their own time.

One teacher said: “(I am) having to use all of my preparation, planning and assessment (PPA) time to complete the RBA as I cannot leave the other 29 new children with one teaching assistant.

“This means the work I would have completed in PPA time is being done at lunchtime or after school.”

They added: “After completing the RBA I will still have to do our usual on-entry assessments.”

Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the NEU, said: “The Government persists in spending millions on assessment systems for which there is no evidence of value, when teachers and parents are crying out for serious investment in early years education.”

Education union NAHT was more positive about the change.

General secretary Paul Whiteman welcomed the move to end Year 2 SATs.

“NAHT has long argued that it makes little sense to take a baseline measure for progress midway through the primary years, as is the case now, effectively ignoring the incredible work and progress made in those critical first few years of school.

“The introduction of a reliable and workable baseline assessment to replace Year 2 SATs has the potential to be a fairer way of measuring progress.”

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← PM is ‘utterly delusional’ over immigration plan impact on Scotland – Blackford ← Savid Javid sends warnings over Johnson’s move to gain greater control of Treasury in personal statement
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->