• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

People ‘trust scientists more than politicians – even when the evidence is outlandish’

Researchers found that members of the public in both Britain and the United States have far greater trust in scientific experts than the government

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2018-07-12 00:11
in News, Politics, Science
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

People trust scientists more than politicians – even when the evidence is outlandish, according to a new study.

Researchers found that members of the public in both Britain and the United States have far greater trust in scientific experts than the government.

In three large scale experiments, conducted by Queen Mary University of London researchers, participants were asked to make several judgments about ‘nudges’ -behavioural interventions designed to improve decisions in our day-to-day lives.

The nudges were introduced either by a group of leading scientific experts or a government working group consisting of special interest groups and policy makers.

Some of the nudges were real and had been implemented, such as using catchy pictures in stairwells to encourage people to take the stairs, while others were fictitious and actually implausible – such as stirring coffee anti-clockwise for two minutes to avoid any cancerous effects.

The findings, published in the journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology, showed that trust was higher for scientists than the government working group, even when the scientists were proposing fictitious nudges.

Co-author Prof Norman Fenton, of Queen Mary’s School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, said: “While people judged genuine nudges as more plausible than fictitious nudges, people trusted some fictitious nudges proposed by scientists as more plausible than genuine nudges proposed by government.

“For example, people were more likely trust the health benefits of coffee stirring than exercise if the former was recommended by scientists and the latter by government.”

The results also revealed that there was a slight tendency for the American sample to find the nudges more plausible and more ethical overall compared to the UK sample.

RelatedPosts

Protesters break into House of Lords debate on protesting

Only one constituency out of 632 strongly agrees Britain was right to leave EU

Boris Johnson told ‘a lie’ over Putin missile attack claims, says Kremlin

Penny Mordaunt favourite to become Tory Chairman

The study’s lead author was Dr Magda Osman, of Queen Mary’s School of Biological and Chemical Sciences.

She said: “In the context of debates regarding the loss of trust in experts, what we show is that in actual fact, when compared to a government working group, the public in the US and UK judge scientists very favourably, so much so that they show greater levels of trust even when the interventions that are being proposed are implausible and most likely ineffective.

“This means that the public still have a high degree of trust in experts, in particular, in this case, social scientists.”

She added: “The evidence suggests that trust in scientists is high, but that the public are sceptical about nudges in which they might be manipulated without them knowing.

“They consider these as less ethical and trust the experts proposing them less with nudges in which they do have an idea of what is going on.”

She said nudges have become highly popular decision-support methods used by governments to help in a wide range of areas such as health, personal finances, and general well-being.

The scientific claim is that to help people make better decisions regarding their lifestyle choices, and those that improve the welfare of the state, it is potentially effective to subtly change the framing of the decision-making context, which makes the option which maximises long term future gains more prominent.

In essence, the position adopted by nudge enthusiasts is that poor social outcomes are often the result of poor decision-making, and to address this, behavioural interventions such as nudges can be used to reduce the likelihood of poor decisions being made in the first place.

Dr Osman added: “Overall, the public make pretty sensible judgments, and what this shows is that people will scrutinise the information they are provided by experts, so long as they are given a means to do it.

“In other words, ask the questions in the right way, and people will show a level of scrutiny that is often not attributed to them.

“So, before there are strong claims made about public opinion about experts, and knee-jerk policy responses to this, it might be worth being a bit more careful about how the public are surveyed in the first place.”

ENDS

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

My writing journey: David Shannon

Manchester Dogs’ Home rebuild complete four years after fire killed 60 animals

No room at the inn – 90% of holiday accommodation in UK staycation hotspots ALREADY booked

Ten things to do in Alabama

Alex Lodge: Weekly Report Vol. 29

Boris Johnson accused of keeping Russian interference report hidden ahead of election

Contrast between the French and British response to energy crisis laid bare

Vicious brawl between huntsmen & protesters leaves activist with broken skull but police take no action

One in three lesbian, gay & bisexual uni students ‘has attempted suicide while two-thirds have self-harmed’

Indonesia sending back hundreds containers of waste from West

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.