• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • FAQ
  • Meet the Team
  • About The London Economic
  • Advertise
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Cancer patient slams ‘selfish and individualistic’ anti-face covering protesters

Supporters of the new face covering rule in English shops believe it could help save lives.

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
July 14, 2020
in News

A cancer patient who has been shielding for four months has blasted protesters against the new mandatory face covering rule in English shops, describing them as “selfish and individualistic”.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has faced a backlash over the new rule from Conservative Party members and former minister Sir Desmond Swayne, who claimed it goes against their libertarian values and that there is insufficient evidence that the measure has meaningful health benefits.

The new rule is a “way to make everybody safer”

For Angela Steatham, however, the new rule is “a way to make everybody safer”, as she describes sacrificing her freedom after shielding in her home in Powis, North Wales, for 122 days and counting.

Ms Steatham, 56, has chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and was also diagnosed with skin cancer while shielding.

“I’m old enough to remember seat belts being made mandatory and there was exactly the same sort of reaction,” she told PA news agency.

“Now, nobody would question wearing a seat belt except absolute idiots.”

In Wales, face coverings will only become mandatory for public transport when new rules come into force on July 27.

RelatedPosts

‘Exasperating’ – Campaigners slam decision not to review lockdown killing of woman by husband

‘Not good enough’ – anger over decision not to prioritise teachers for vaccine

Millionaires send plea to governments asking them to ‘tax us’

All for just £1,750! Treated like ‘animals’ and ‘prisoners’ says quarantine hotel traveller

Ms Steatham said: “When I see people disputing the need to take precautions, when I have sacrificed my freedom and independence, it makes me so mad.

“It’s selfish and individualistic.

“It’s not about them catching the virus, it’s about them not transmitting it.”

“It’s not about them catching the virus, it’s about them not transmitting it”

One doctor at a London hospital told PA: “I wore an FFP3 (respiratory mask), some goggles, a hat, a full-length gown with the consistency of a bin bag and two pairs of gloves solidly for about two months.

“A bunch of Tories can wear a napkin over their face to go Waitrose.”

Spurgeon Smith, from Kings Heath, Birmingham, believes the Government was too late in imposing the new face covering rule, which comes into force in England from June 24 and carries a maximum fine of £100 for non-compliance.

His brother Alanzo Smith, 62, a mental health worker from Chingford in north-east London, died on May 10 after testing positive for coronavirus.

Speaking to PA, Spurgeon Smith said: “If we were told to wear masks in February or March, he (Alanzo) would’ve had a better chance of being saved.

“It’s a bit late to have this rule now but I think it’s a good idea.

“It’s better to do this now before a possible second wave.”

“For the public good”

Nobel Prize-winning biologist and Royal Society president Venki Ramakrishnan said wearing a face covering was “for the public good”.

He told PA: “We do it for the same reason that we no longer smoke in restaurants and public places and wear seat belts.

“In the old days people have a few drinks and go home driving in a car, the chances that they’ll kill somebody on an individual basis was not high but if everybody did it there’d be a lot of accidents.

“You have to look at it as a point of public good, anything that reduces the chances of disruptive surges and second waves is a good thing.”

Keith Neal, emeritus professor of the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham, said the lack of strong evidence of the effectiveness of face coverings should not be considered a problem.

He added: “The evidence is accumulating that they have a part to play in reducing transmission and also in protecting the wearer.

“Issues may arise on exemptions apart from age as people can claim to meet one of the exemption categories without obvious evidence.

“Exemptions like for anxiety can easily be used as an excuse given the apparent reluctance from too many people.”

Related: Tories cut up membership cards in protest over new face mask rules

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending fromTLE

  • All
  • trending

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

Stress, fear and homelessness: The threat looming over families confronted with eviction

File photo dated 07/11/03 of a prison cell.

The Other Prison Pandemic

Latest from TLE

Undated handout photo issued by Gwent Police of Ruth Williams, whose husband, Anthony, is accused of killing his wife of 44 years during the coronavirus lockdown. PA Photo. Issue date: Tuesday March 31, 2020.

‘Exasperating’ – Campaigners slam decision not to review lockdown killing of woman by husband

‘Not good enough’ – anger over decision not to prioritise teachers for vaccine

Millionaires send plea to governments asking them to ‘tax us’

All for just £1,750! Treated like ‘animals’ and ‘prisoners’ says quarantine hotel traveller

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: jack@thelondoneconomic.com

Commercial enquiries, please contact: advertise@thelondoneconomic.com

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech & Auto
  • About The London Economic
  • Meet the Team
  • Privacy policy

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.