• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

‘Shapps seems hell-bent on pushing up carbon emissions’ as he ‘ignored advice’ on £27bn roads plan

“They didn’t want us to find out that Grant Shapps had ignored advice that national roads policy was out of date and needed reviewing."

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2021-02-12 13:20
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Campaigners mounting a legal challenge against the Government’s £27 billion road investment plan claim Transport Secretary Grant Shapps ignored official advice to review the scheme on environmental grounds, it has been reported.

Transport Action Network (Tan) is accusing the Department for Transport (DfT) of failing to take account of the Paris Agreement, which commits signatories such as the UK to tackle climate change by taking measures to limit global warming to well below 2C.

The Guardian has seen court documents filed as part of Tan’s legal challenge which indicate that Mr Shapps went against advice given by DfT civil servants that he should review the 2014 National Policy Statement (NPS) for national networks, which led to a £15 billion road building programme.

The newspaper reported that the submission by David Wolfe QC, representing the campaigners, stated: “On the day before the limitation period for issuing this challenge was due to expire, the defendant provided the claimant with the advice of his officials, which was that it was appropriate to review the NPS.”

Grant Shapps (Kirsty O'Connor/PA)
Grant Shapps (Kirsty O’Connor/PA)

He added: “The claimants have been presented, on the one hand, with official reasoning in support of a review, and on the other, with a decision by the defendant not to review the NPS, with no explanation of why, or on the basis of what information or considerations, he chose to depart from his officials’ advice.”

Criteria

The DfT insisted that Mr Shapps was told the criteria for a review “had not been fully met”.

In April 2020 the department set out its £27 billion Road Investment Strategy 2 for major roads in England from April 2020 to March 2025.

It includes controversial plans for the A303 Stonehenge tunnel and the Lower Thames Crossing linking Kent and Essex.

Undated handout artist's impression issued by Highways England of how the Lower Thames Crossing junction with the M25 in Essex will look (Highways England/PA)
Artist’s impression issued by Highways England of how the Lower Thames Crossing junction with the M25 in Essex will look (Highways England/PA)

Tan director Chris Todd said: “The Government has obstructed our application at every turn and now it’s clear for everyone to see why.

RelatedPosts

Failure for Trump as he declares ‘no deal’ with Putin over Ukraine war

Study finds people ‘became more left-wing’ after access to The Sun was limited

Tories rage at 800-year-old English jury system after Labour councillor cleared of charges

Labour minister issues perfect response as Farage urges PM to appoint Reform peers

“They didn’t want us to find out that Grant Shapps had ignored advice that national roads policy was out of date and needed reviewing.

“Far from showing global leadership on tackling climate change, Grant Shapps seems hell-bent on pushing up carbon emissions by approving every road possible.”

Reined in

He added: “It is clear that the Department for Transport is out of control and needs to be reined in.

“An urgent review of the national roads policy and suspension of the roads programme would be a good place to start.”

A DfT spokeswoman said: “The advice to the Transport Secretary set out that the criteria for a review of the National Policy Statement had not been fully met.

“We are unable to comment further due to ongoing legal proceedings.”

Related: PMQs Feb 10th – Mr Crisis Johnson can’t control his hair or our borders

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← KPMG UK chairman quits after telling staff unconscious bias is ‘complete crap’ ← ‘Falling at the very first hurdle’ – quarantine hotel booking website down three days before policy launches
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->