• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Wales takes Westminster to court over law-breaking Internal Market Act

The Welsh government said said the Act was an “attack” on the powers of the Senedd.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2021-04-16 13:18
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

The Welsh government is taking legal action against Westminster over the Internal Market Act, which it says “severely curtails” the powers of the Senedd.

Counsel General for Wales Jeremy Miles is trying to bring a full High Court challenge over the Act, which he argues could prevent the Senedd from making laws on food or environmental standards.

Announcing the legal action in January, Miles said the Act was an “attack” on the powers of the Senedd, and also includes “wide Henry VIII powers” which UK ministers could use to “cut down the devolution settlement”.

Lawyers representing Miles are seeking declarations that the Act “must be interpreted so that it does not impliedly repeal areas of devolved competence”.

They also want the High Court to declare that the so-called Henry VIII powers do not allow Westminster to make “substantive amendments” to the devolved powers of the Welsh government.

At a hearing in London on Friday, Miles asked the High Court to allow the case to proceed to a full hearing later this year.

But the UK government argues that the claim is “hypothetical”, and that “nothing in the Internal Market Act alters the devolved competence of the Senedd”.

RelatedPosts

Labor win presents ‘great opportunity’ in fight to free Julian Assange

‘A rare Murdoch defeat’: Reaction as Scott Morrison accepts defeat in Australian elections

Labor topples Conservatives in Australia as Scott Morrison suffers defeat

Former Tory Party leader calls for benefits to be boosted in line with inflation

Helen Mountfield QC, representing Miles, said the Act appeared to give the UK government “broad powers … to modify the Internal Market Act itself, devolution legislation and other primary legislation”.

She told the court: “At least on one reading, these provisions so severely curtail the competence of the Senedd, formerly the Welsh Assembly, to legislate in areas which are not reserved to the Westminster Parliament … as to impliedly remove those areas from Senedd competence.”

Mountfield added that the Act appeared to “enable the Secretary of State to amend the very scope of the devolution settlement in wide and unspecified future ways”.

She argued that the Internal Market Act meant that “any attempt to impose different or more rigorous standards in one nation will be interpreted as a barrier to trade between the nations of the UK and consequently void”.

Mountfield said that “effectively the Welsh government cannot make new environmental standards at all”.

She also said the “ongoing uncertainty” about the scope of the Act “renders the scope of the devolution settlement … incoherent, unstable and unworkable”.

However, Sir James Eadie QC – representing Westminster – said in written submissions: “The Act plainly and expressly applies across the entirety of the United Kingdom, to legislation of the devolved legislatures and administrations, and to secondary legislation made by a UK minister, where it would affect the UK internal market.”

He added: “Parliament was entitled to make specific provision in respect of the UK internal market … and Parliament’s legislative and drafting choices may not be called into question by the back door, as the claimant seeks to achieve.”

Sir James also said: “Nothing in the Act alters the devolved competence of the Senedd – the subject matters of the areas in which legislative competence exists is unaffected.

“But the Act does prevent legislation having effect in a manner which purports to restrict in a prohibited manner goods or services produced in, or provided from, a different part of the United Kingdom, so as to preserve the internal market.

“There is no ambiguity in what the Act does and the claimant is not entitled to invite the court to question the approach taken by Parliament.”

Related: Government accused of ‘falsely imprisoning’ care home residents

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

“Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?”

Mental health charity slams Govt ‘irresponsible’ Coronavirus bill which would grant single doctors power to detain mentally ill

Is this England’s most patriotic estate?

Europe’s most prolific ‘re-watcher’ has been revealed as mum and baby who watched Bee Movie .. 357 times

‘Apple has built a closed ecosystem:’ EU moves forward in antitrust case

Explainer: What this October’s 19th National Party Congress can tell us about Xi Jinping

High street stores & supermarkets stockpiling food at warehouse in case of no-deal Brexit

EXCLUSIVE: Govt refuses to say if EU travellers to UK will also benefit from ‘no quarantine’

JLEN Environmental Assets – Battery storage potential

The Best Game of 2016

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.