A minister has become embroiled in a row after apparently saying that policies blamed for the high rate of Covid-19 deaths in care homes were based on scientific advice.
The movement of elderly patients into residential care without testing them for coronavirus in order to free up hospital beds has been blamed for the high death toll in care homes – accounting for around 57% of all fatalities.
Care minister Helen Whately was forced to backtrack on Sky News on Tuesday morning after appearing to claim this decision was guided by science.
When quizzed by Kay Burley over the policy, Ms Whately said: “As we have learned more about the virus we have updated those infection control guidance, we have taken more steps, we have done the social care action plan.
“At all points in this we have followed the scientific guidance.”
Can’t stick on scientists
Ms Burley replied: “And then you make the policy – you take (scientists’) advice and then you make the policy – you can’t stick this on the scientists.
The MP responded: “But I can, because…”
Ms Burley said: “You can stick it on the scientists?”
“No, no, no – that is not what I mean to say,” Ms Whatley replied.
Ms Burley said: “You just said you can stick this on the scientists – either you can or you can’t.”
“To be clear, that is your words,” Ms Whatley responded.
Ms Burley said: “I said ‘You can’t stick this on the scientists’ and you said you can – I didn’t put those words in your mouth.”
Ms Whatley responded: “What I mean to say is that we have taken the scientific advice at every stage of this process – we have taken the scientific advice and then judgment is made about what is the right decision to take.”
She continued: “We have been trying to do everything we can for those in care homes because we know that they are at greater risk.”
Data published by NHS England in early June revealed an increase in the number of patients discharged to care homes in March.
It showed that the number of patients transferred to homes – as a proportion of all hospital discharges – rose from 2.2% at the start of March to 3.5% by the end of the month.
It had dropped back to 2.3% by April 16.
The Government has defended its track record on care homes, with Health Secretary Matt Hancock insisting in the Commons last month that a “ring of protection” had been thrown around them from the very start of the crisis.
A DHSC spokesman said previously: “We have been working tirelessly with the care sector to reduce transmission and save lives, and have based all our decisions on the latest scientific and clinical advice – as a result nearly two-thirds of care homes have had no outbreak at all.”
Last month, Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey was also accused of trying to deflect criticism from Government policy by laying the blame at scientists’ door.
Speaking to Sky News on May 19, she said: “If the science was wrong, advice at the time was wrong, I’m not surprised if people then think we made a wrong decision.”
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .