Priti Patel has been slammed for smirking as Andrew Marr read a list of companies which have raised concerns about a no-deal Brexit.
The Home Secretary appeared on the show to address fears of British industry groups who are at the “forefront” of the economy.
Representatives from the chemical, aerospace and food sectors, have raised concerns that a no-deal Brexit posed a “serious risk to manufacturing competitiveness”.
Fall on deaf ears
But their worries seem to fall on deaf ears when Marr put it to Patel.
Halfway through reading out a list of groups who have raised concerns in a letter to the government about a no-deal Brexit, Mr Marr said: “I can’t see why you are laughing.”
The Conservative minister did not respond to the comment and replied by saying the government has been making preparation to mitigate any potential negative impact of no-deal.
Marr went on to question whether a hit on economic growth to the tune of 6.7 per cent was something worth paying.
Ms Patel responded: “Well, I don’t accept that, and you know, I don’t know which data you’re quoting”, even though the figures were taken from the government’s own modelling.
Priti Patel smirking as Andrew Marr reads out a list of industries terrified by the government’s plan is Brexit in a nutshell. They don’t give a shit. #marr pic.twitter.com/QKpsIe0Bnb
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) October 13, 2019
Boris Johnson’s Brexit proposals
A new report yesterday revealed that Boris Johnson’s Brexit proposals would leave UK economy worse off than Theresa May’s deal.
The difference between May’s deal and Johnson’s proposals arise from the UK having no customs union with the EU, no level playing field arrangements and a limited (or quite possibly no) free trade agreement.
The impact of Mr Johnson’s proposals on UK GDP per capita ten years after Brexit could be between -2.3 per cent and -7 per cent, compared to remaining in the EU.
This compares to May’s deal, between -1.9 per cent and -5.5 per cent, and an exit on WTO terms, between -3.5 per cent and ‑8.7 per cent.
The ranges reflect uncertainty regarding migration policy and the impact on productivity.
Under Johnson’s proposals, the best-case scenario would result in a £16 billion hit to public finances per year, based on current GDP, and a £49 billion hit in the worst-case scenario.
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
