• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Matt Hancock broke law over Dido Harding appointment, high court rules

Hancock did not comply with a public sector equality duty when appointing Harding to a top job in 2020.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2022-02-15 11:34
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Matt Hancock broke the law by appointing Tory peer Dido Harding to lead a new public health body, the high court has ruled.

Two judges have ruled that the former health secretary did not comply with public sector equality duty in appointing Harding and Mike Coupe, her ex-Sainsbury colleague, to senior positions in 2020.

Dr Halima Begum, the head of the Runnymede Trust, said the ruling showed the significance of public sector equality laws in protecting people “from the closed shop of government appointments”.

She added: “Across the country, there are countless talented and well qualified public health specialists and administrators who could have successfully fulfilled the roles handed to Baroness Harding and Mr Coupe.”

Personal and political connections

The court ruled that Hancock broke the law by appointing Harding as chair of the National Institute for Health Protection (NIHP), and Coupe as director of testing at Test and Trace.

It declared that the disgraced former health secretary “did not comply with the public sector equality duty in relations to the decisions” to appoint the pair.

The judgement added: “There is no evidence from anyone saying exactly what was done to comply with the public sector equality duty when decisions were taken on how each appointment was to be made.”

RelatedPosts

Johnson urges people to ‘hold your horses’ ahead of Sue Gray report publication

Boris Johnson would have been ‘churlish’ to decline Sue Gray’s invite – minister

Susanna Reid on fire as she grills Tory MP over PM’s lawbreaking activities

Sue Gray partygate report set to be published amid heightened scrutiny over PM’s meeting

But the judges dismissed a separate claim by legal campaign group the Good Law Project, which partnered with Runnymede in the case, that the government did not adopt an “open” process when making appointments “critical to the pandemic response”.

They also found that “the evidence provides no support” for the claim that Harding and Coupe were appointed because of “personal or political connections”.

The ruling stated: “Baroness Harding had previous relevant experience of senior positions in large retail businesses and in the NHS. Mr Coupe had vast experience of managing complex public-facing organisations.”

Begum and Maugham respond

Dr Halima Begum, CEO of the Runnymede Trust, said: “The judgement handed down today by the High Court is incredibly significant to the British people. It shows the importance of the Public Sector Equality Duty and its role in protecting the people of this nation from the closed shop of government appointments, not least in a time of national crisis where people from our minority communities were dying from Covid in hugely disproportionate numbers.

“Across the country, there are countless talented and well qualified public health specialists and administrators who could have successfully fulfilled the roles handed to Baroness Harding and Mr Coupe, whether or not on the basis of their interest in horse racing or the fact that their husband attended Eton. This includes members of our disabled and ethnic minority communities.

“This case should never have required litigation given how self-evident it is that compliance with the law does not allow members of the Executive to simply appoint their friends to senior public sector jobs without giving, at a bare minimum, due consideration to the Equality Act. In the context of levelling up and the government’s expressed commitment to race equity, the Court’s judgement that our Prime Minister and then Health Secretary did not appear to think twice about acting without regard to equalities law should be a matter of grave public concern.”

Jo Maugham, director of Good Law Project, added: “Change doesn’t happen, things don’t get better for those who are disadvantaged, unless those in power care. That means making sure they ask themselves: ‘how do I level society up for the disabled and ethnic minorities?’ And it means taking the time to find the best people – not the best connected people – for the job.”

Related: Russia sends troops home, raising de-escalation hopes

Tags: Dido HardingMatt Hancock

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

Lord Bath, eccentric owner of Longleat Safari Park, has died of coronavirus

UK workforce headed for crisis post-Brexit as businesses plan to cut full-time staff

Just Eat partner with FoodCycle to raise money for hungry and in-need

All for just £1,750! Treated like ‘animals’ and ‘prisoners’ says quarantine hotel traveller

‘Definitely not a world-beating system!’ Test and Trace ‘confusion’ leading some users to call contacts themselves

Thousands march through London in support of Palestine during Gaza ceasefire

Film Review: Lu Over the Wall

Massive ice sheet melting faster than feared – threatening coastal cities around world

Thinking of a new adventure place this summer holidays – think Cancun

European court overturns ruling on Starbucks tax deal with Netherlands

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.