• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Matt Hancock broke law over Dido Harding appointment, high court rules

Hancock did not comply with a public sector equality duty when appointing Harding to a top job in 2020.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2022-02-15 11:34
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Matt Hancock broke the law by appointing Tory peer Dido Harding to lead a new public health body, the high court has ruled.

Two judges have ruled that the former health secretary did not comply with public sector equality duty in appointing Harding and Mike Coupe, her ex-Sainsbury colleague, to senior positions in 2020.

Dr Halima Begum, the head of the Runnymede Trust, said the ruling showed the significance of public sector equality laws in protecting people “from the closed shop of government appointments”.

She added: “Across the country, there are countless talented and well qualified public health specialists and administrators who could have successfully fulfilled the roles handed to Baroness Harding and Mr Coupe.”

Personal and political connections

The court ruled that Hancock broke the law by appointing Harding as chair of the National Institute for Health Protection (NIHP), and Coupe as director of testing at Test and Trace.

It declared that the disgraced former health secretary “did not comply with the public sector equality duty in relations to the decisions” to appoint the pair.

The judgement added: “There is no evidence from anyone saying exactly what was done to comply with the public sector equality duty when decisions were taken on how each appointment was to be made.”

But the judges dismissed a separate claim by legal campaign group the Good Law Project, which partnered with Runnymede in the case, that the government did not adopt an “open” process when making appointments “critical to the pandemic response”.

They also found that “the evidence provides no support” for the claim that Harding and Coupe were appointed because of “personal or political connections”.

RelatedPosts

Reform MP brags she ‘knows what it is like to hire and fire’ employees

Rachel Reeves ‘cries’ at PMQs after welfare chaos

Keir Starmer urged to apologise to disabled people after welfare chaos

Stop Brexit Steve confronts minister on £40bn EU blackhole

The ruling stated: “Baroness Harding had previous relevant experience of senior positions in large retail businesses and in the NHS. Mr Coupe had vast experience of managing complex public-facing organisations.”

Begum and Maugham respond

Dr Halima Begum, CEO of the Runnymede Trust, said: “The judgement handed down today by the High Court is incredibly significant to the British people. It shows the importance of the Public Sector Equality Duty and its role in protecting the people of this nation from the closed shop of government appointments, not least in a time of national crisis where people from our minority communities were dying from Covid in hugely disproportionate numbers.

“Across the country, there are countless talented and well qualified public health specialists and administrators who could have successfully fulfilled the roles handed to Baroness Harding and Mr Coupe, whether or not on the basis of their interest in horse racing or the fact that their husband attended Eton. This includes members of our disabled and ethnic minority communities.

“This case should never have required litigation given how self-evident it is that compliance with the law does not allow members of the Executive to simply appoint their friends to senior public sector jobs without giving, at a bare minimum, due consideration to the Equality Act. In the context of levelling up and the government’s expressed commitment to race equity, the Court’s judgement that our Prime Minister and then Health Secretary did not appear to think twice about acting without regard to equalities law should be a matter of grave public concern.”

Jo Maugham, director of Good Law Project, added: “Change doesn’t happen, things don’t get better for those who are disadvantaged, unless those in power care. That means making sure they ask themselves: ‘how do I level society up for the disabled and ethnic minorities?’ And it means taking the time to find the best people – not the best connected people – for the job.”

Related: Russia sends troops home, raising de-escalation hopes

Tags: Dido HardingMatt Hancock

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Polestar 1 review: so this is what a good PHEV is ← ‘WE NEED NEW HOUSES! But don’t build it here!’: Reddit post gets people talking about UK housing
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->