• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Jenrick directed millions to towns in Tory marginals before election

A report in the National Audit Office revealed the process by which ministers selected 101 English towns to each benefit from a £25 million boost to their economies last September

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2020-07-21 09:50
in Politics
Credit;PA

Credit;PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Robert Jenrick directed a government regeneration scheme that targeted millions of pounds in grants at marginal Conservative seats before the last election.

A report in the National Audit Office (NAO), released today, has revealed the process by which ministers selected 101 English towns to each benefit from a £25 million boost to their economies last September.

More than 60 of those towns were chosen by a group of ministers led by Robert Jenrick, the housing and communities secretary. Analysis by The Times found that all but one of them were either Conservative-held seats, or Tory targets before the election.

Of the seats held by Conservative MPs, eight-in-ten had majorities of less than 5,000. Each Labour seat targeted for funding was won by the Conservatives in December’s election.

Just two towns chosen had comfortable majorities of more than 10,000 before the election – one of which was Newark, Jenrick’s seat.

‘Flimsy, cherry-picked evidence’

The report is likely to pile further pressure onto the housing secretary, who has already faced scrutiny over his approval of a housing development backed by a major Tory donor, which he signed off on against the advice of officials.

Meg Hillier, who chairs the public accounts committee in the Commons, told reporters she would look into the report.

RelatedPosts

Kate Hoey says Brits want Boris to resign ‘because he delivered Brexit’

Tory MP says NHS staff probably partied like Downing Street officials during pandemic

Johnson will be forced to resign if committee finds he misled Commons

Town councillor resigns after claims that he’s Banksy made his role ‘untenable’

She said: “This NAO report shows that some of the most deprived towns in England will be left behind once again,” she said. “Taxpayers’ money is not other people’s money and if ministers were so closely involved it might be seen by some as political.

“Nine out of ten towns were ruled out with no explanation before they reached the starting line, while some affluent towns are still in the running. Ministers relied on flimsy, cherry-picked evidence to choose the lucky towns. Those that lost out have not yet had the chance to make their case.”

The £3.6 billion towns fund was unveiled soon after Boris Johnson entered Downing Street, as part of an early pledge to “rebalance growth” across England after Brexit. 

The towns selected were published by Jenrick in September, but the criteria by which they were chosen has not been revealed until now.

‘Matter of urgency’

According to the NAO report, officials came up with seven criteria for deciding which towns should receive cash – including income, low productivity and exposure to Brexit. 

While all 40 high-priority towns were automatically selected for funding, the remaining 61 were chosen at ministers’ discretion – 12 were officially classed as “low priority”, with nine of those marginals.

Steve Reed, the shadow communities secretary, told The Times: “There are now serious concerns that ministers may have allocated funding for political gain at the 2019 election, something which breaks strict rules on impartiality.

“The secretary of state must explain as a matter of urgency how ministers decided where to spend this money and why so many communities lost out.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government added: “As set out in the report the department put in place a robust process to identify towns for Town Deals, which ministers followed throughout. 

“The selection criteria was set by officials and took into account factors including income deprivation, skills, productivity and investment opportunities.”

Related: #CorbynWasRight trends on Twitter after amendment to protect NHS from foreign control gets voted down

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

Nigel Farage channels Churchill as Trump is impeached…. again

Jacob Rees-Mogg wants to extract ‘every last drop’ of North Sea oil

Watch – 60 firefighters tackle inferno at oil & gas factory in business park near Gatwick Airport

London Film Festival 2018 First Look Review – Assassination Nation

Eton should admit girls, says Education Secretary Gavin Williamson

Weather forecast, alerts and UVB index for London, Monday 8 June 2020

China ‘carrying out demographic genocide’ against Muslim population

How to Make: duck rillettes & Peckham Pale Ale pickled onions

The biggest gripes for Britain’s rental households is revealed

PM does NOT apologise after Nazanin tells him she lived in ‘shadow of his words’

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.