• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Watch: Anger as Meghan Markle compared to Rebekah Vardy by minor aristocrat

Lady Colin Campbell said the Duchess Meghan Markle is 'very committed to being self serving,' as she compared her to Rebekah Vardy.

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2022-08-02 14:16
in News
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A minor aristocrat has compared Meghan Markle to Rebekah Vardy during an interview on GB News.

Lady Colin Campbell said the two women have ‘no apparent talent,’ who ‘think they know everything.’

Markle was a successful actor before she married Prince Harry.

On the other side, Rebekah Vardy’s failed libel case against Coleen Rooney is an “absolute disaster” for her reputation and “as damaging as it could be”, a media lawyer has said.

Jonathan Coad said the prospects for Mrs Vardy, who is married to Leicester striker Jamie Vardy, of getting endorsements or television work in the future have “suffered severely”.

Last week Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed Mrs Vardy’s libel claim which she brought against Mrs Rooney over a viral social media post.

Self-serving

However, the royal expert still claimed that Markle is ‘very committed to being self serving.’

After comparing the mother-of-two to Rebekah Vardy, she told the presenter: ‘We seem to have a whole slew of really rather tiresome, very opinionated women, who seem to have made their way in life through talents which are not immediately apparent, and they think they’re the best thing since sliced bread. And they know everything.’

She went on: “This is a woman who, in my opinion, everything is calculated and it all comes down to status, and bucks and attention.’

RelatedPosts

Vladimir Putin lists his three demands to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Government takes steps to appeal court ruling banning asylum seekers from Epping hotel

Israeli minister says ‘gates of hell will open’ on Gaza City

Full-time workers are turning to food banks amid cost of living crisis

Campbell added: ‘Notice how dexterously she moved him from the royal family to California…she has clearly decided that she wasn’t going to give her time or her energy to the British people or was serving humanity when she could serve her financial interests in a community property state, where in the event of a divorce she gets a whopping 50 per cent.’

‘She is, in some ways, on a very slippery slope, shades of Rebekah Vardy.’

Lady C says Meghan Markle was always likely to serve her personal financial interests over the British people.

📺 Freeview 236, Sky 515, Virgin 626

💻 GB News YouTube: https://t.co/Wa58gYGZwF pic.twitter.com/Ed40ONBo3g

— GB News (@GBNEWS) July 30, 2022

Reactions

Her comments didn’t go down that well:

1.

This channel is so BORING. They only rotate like 3 topics
1. Meghan Markle
2. Prince Harry
3. Any excuse to use the word "woke"
I predict it lasting no longer than 3 yrs at this rate

— Jules (@cindi_barr) July 31, 2022

2.

pic.twitter.com/8fz2gyDudX

— Gareth (@howietyper) August 2, 2022

3.

Only if Meghan Markle plays Rebekah Vardy. https://t.co/zScjzllt46

— The (Brittas) Empire Strikes Back (@brittas_strikes) July 30, 2022

4.

This person has been milking a connection to the Royals for decades, nothing but a nasty piece of work

— Gizmo1234 (@Gizmo12343) August 2, 2022

5.

Why do your idiot viewers believe the vile @LadyColinCampb has any inside knowledge of the RF or #MeghanAndHarry?! She’s as much a part of the inner circle as my goldfish! Now if they want to know the special offers on cheap drink at our local Tesco Extra, she’s defo your man 😂

— Grizzly Kitten (@TheIceMaidenBrr) July 31, 2022

Related: #Abolishthemonarchy trends as Prince Charles ‘accepted £1m from family of Osama bin Laden’

Tags: Meghan Markle

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Richard Madeley calls Chloe Kelly ‘Coco’ during GMB interview ← Sunak says it’s wrong to renegotiate Australian trade deal but is proved hypocritical in viral video
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->