The Government-backed review of racial disparities in Britain is “out of step” with public opinion, an education union has said.
It comes as chairman of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Dr Tony Sewell has been been accused of putting a “positive spin on slavery and empire” when explaining the report’s recommendation on teaching history in schools.
The report proposes a Making Of Modern Britain teaching resource to “tell the multiple, nuanced stories of the contributions made by different groups that have made this country the one it is today”.
In Mr Sewell’s foreword to the report, he said the recommendation was the body’s response to “negative calls for ‘decolonising’ the curriculum”.
He wrote that the resource should look at the influence of the UK during its empire period and how “Britishness influenced the Commonwealth” and how local communities influenced “modern Britain”.
Senior adviser
In light of the report Boris Johnson’s most senior black adviser has resigned as ministers face a backlash after a Government-backed review said Britain is no longer a country where the “system is deliberately rigged against ethnic minorities”.
Samuel Kasumu has quit his role as a special adviser to the Prime Minister on civil society but will stay in post until May to continue work on improving vaccine uptake in minority groups, Politico reported.
The timing of Mr Kasumu’s departure comes after the landmark report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities (Cred) faced heavy criticism over its findings, with claims that it is culturally deaf, out of step with public opinion, and “steeped in denial”.
“Verbose”
Now Alex Stevens, Professor in Criminal Justice at University of Kent has written a thread slamming the report.
1.
“The #SewellReport really is a verbose, sloppy and intellectually dishonest piece of work. In the bits I know about (drugs and crime), there is a pattern of misleading readers by mischaracterising the sources it cites. Here are some examples.”
The #SewellReport really is a verbose, sloppy and intellectually dishonest piece of work. In the bits I know about (drugs and crime), there is a pattern of misleading readers by mischaracterising the sources it cites. Here are some examples. 1/n
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
2.
“To back a claim that cannabis is a ‘gateway’ drug, it cites a 2002 ACMD report. Here’s what a later (2008) ACMD report says on the issue.”
To back a claim that cannabis is a ‘gateway’ drug, it cites a 2002 ACMD report. Here’s what a later (2008) ACMD report says on the issue pic.twitter.com/ecFXExz6XS
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
3.
“To support the idea that stop and search works, they rely on a study in the BJC . While this study found a small association with lower recorded drug crime, it conclude, ‘claims that this is an effective way to control and deter offending seem misplaced’.”
To support the idea that stop and search works, they rely on a study in the BJC . While this study found a small association with lower recorded drug crime, it conclude, ‘claims that this is an effective way to control and deter offending seem misplaced’. https://t.co/6vEW3nmxHs
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
4.
“In discussing the link between race, crime and violent victimisation, the Commission write that age and deprivation explains much of the difference between ethnic groups. The cited report actually shows the disparity is not washed away by deprivation.”
In discussing the link between race, crime and violent victimisation, the Commission write that age and deprivation explains much of the difference between ethnic groups. The cited report actually shows the disparity is not washed away by deprivation. https://t.co/NlQidlIZYh pic.twitter.com/Y9y9Fou5Ue
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
5.
“Perhaps most egregiously, they misrepresent the words of Dame Angiolini in her report on deaths in custody (a report which repeatedly mentions the institutional racism of which Sewell’s Commission denies the existence). Here is their quote of her words…”
Perhaps most egregiously, they misrepresent the words of Dame Angiolini in her report on deaths in custody (a report which repeatedly mentions the institutional racism of which Sewell’s Commission denies the existence). Here is their quote of her words… pic.twitter.com/GSznReVKtN
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
6.
“Here are her own words. Judge for yourself if the quote was deliberately cut to change its meaning.”
Here are her own words. Judge for yourself if the quote was deliberately cut to change its meaning. pic.twitter.com/4pZKpvZBkN
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
7.
“To be fair, there are also citations that check out (e.g. to this study of the lack of racial bias in jury decisions).”
To be fair, there are also citations that check out (e.g. to this study of the lack of racial bias in jury decisions). https://t.co/5ZlXV2SIke
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
8.
“But there are lots of other relevant research which they did not include in their blizzard of references, presumably because it did not fit their argument. E.g. this report on the lack of effectiveness of increased stop and search.”
But there are lots of other relevant research which they did not include in their blizzard of references, presumably because it did not fit their argument. E.g. this report on the lack of effectiveness of increased stop and search https://t.co/pWR9jzN0F3
— Alex Stevens (@AlexStevensKent) April 2, 2021
In another Tweet on the report Matteo Tiratelli wrote: “Just found out that I am cited in a *highly misleading* way in the #SewellReport. It uses my research to try to argue that stop and search is an effective way of reducing drug-related crime. I hope our abstract speaks for itself… The intellectual dishonesty is astonishing.”
Just found out that I am cited in a *highly misleading* way in the #SewellReport. It uses my research to try to argue that stop and search is an effective way of reducing drug-related crime. I hope our abstract speaks for itself…
— Matteo Tiratelli (@MatteoTiratelli) April 4, 2021
The intellectual dishonesty is astonishing. pic.twitter.com/3AE9jTFNNI
Related: Britain not yet a model for racial equality, Church of England’s first black female bishop has said
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
