• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Hancock keeping job after breach ‘gives ministers green light to break rules’

“This sets a concerning precedent that the rules don’t apply equally, or indeed they don’t apply at all," deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said.

Andra Maciuca by Andra Maciuca
2021-05-31 15:04
in News, Politics
Matt Hancock

Photo: PA.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Allowing Matt Hancock to keep his job after committing a “minor” breach of the ministerial code could give licence for further rule-breaking at the top of government, Labour has said.

The warning comes after the ministerial sleaze watchdog ruled that the health secretary had committed a “technical” breach of the ministerial code.

A probe by Lord Geidt, the independent adviser on ministerial standards, found Hancock failed to declare his sister’s company, which he holds shares in, had become an approved contractor for the NHS.

Ministers cleared

But the ministerial sleaze watchdog ruled the contravention of the code was “minor” and did not call for the Cabinet minister to resign – a recommendation Boris Johnson agreed with.

But deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner has claimed the decision sets a “concerning precedent” – after requesting full details of Johnson’s flat refurbishment on Saturday. Lord Geidt’s findings showed a Tory donor paid for the prime minister’s Downing Street flat refurbishment, but that Johnson was not initially informed.

Secondly it is frankly not believable that the PM apparently had no idea who was funding work that cost tens or even thousands of pounds. Nobody else in the country will have had building work carried out in their home and not know or try to find out who was paying for it. (5/11)

— Angela Rayner 🌹 (@AngelaRayner) May 29, 2021

Traditionally, a breach of the code has led to the resignation of ministers.

However, home secretary Priti Patel kept her job earlier this year and received Boris Johnson’s backing, after being found to have engaged in bullying behaviour towards staff.

Rayner has explained why she has written to Lord Geidt: “This sets a concerning precedent that the rules don’t apply equally, or indeed they don’t apply at all.

“I have asked Lord Geidt whether he agrees that this precedent of a Cabinet minister being found by an independent investigation to have broken the ministerial code and then not resigning sends a very clear message that the rules don’t apply to Cabinet ministers, with this case therefore damaging public trust in our politics, fundamentally weakening the ministerial code system and giving carte blanche to other ministers to break the ministerial code safe in the knowledge that they will not face sanctions.”

RelatedPosts

Bernie Sanders slams Netanyahu amid White House visit

Government emergency alert test to be held within months – date announced

MPs vote to make Premier League matches free to air

Ed Davey urges Keir Starmer to use Macron state visit to ‘show united front’ against Trump’s trade war

Conflict of interest

Mr Hancock declared in the MPs’ register of interests in March this year that he owns 20 per cent of shares in Topwood Limited, a firm owned by his sister and other close family members, which specialises in secure storage, shredding and scanning of documents.

The company, as first reported by the Health Service Journal (HSJ), won a place on a framework to provide services to the English NHS in 2019, as well as contracts with the NHS in Wales, after Mr Hancock was appointed to his Cabinet brief in July 2018.

Lord Geidt, a former private secretary to the Queen who was appointed to his Downing Street role by Mr Johnson, found in a much-delayed report on ministerial interests that Topwood’s approved contractor status could be seen to “represent a conflict of interest” that should have been declared.

In his 10-page report published on Friday, he said: “I assess this earlier failure to declare the interest was as a result of his lack of knowledge and in no way deliberate, and therefore, in technical terms, a minor breach of the ministerial code.”

But Rayner said it was “simply not believable or reasonable” that Mr Hancock “didn’t know about this conflict of interest”.

I've written to the Independent Adviser Lord Geidt again to ask about his conclusion that while the Health Secretary broke the Ministerial Code, he should not resign.

This sets a concerning precedent that the rules don’t apply equally, or indeed they don’t apply at all. (2/10)

— Angela Rayner 🌹 (@AngelaRayner) May 31, 2021

In a lengthy post on the social media website, she said Lord Geidt had allowed Mr Hancock to use a “completely ridiculous excuse” to keep his position at the top of Government.

“The implication of Lord Geidt’s justification, if applied to members of the public, is that people who own 20% stakes in companies don’t know what these companies actually do and people don’t know what companies owned by their sisters do or what their sisters do for a living,” she said.

Related: Labour demands full details of Johnson’s flat refurbishment

Trust ‘completely destroyed’ in complaints process after Patel bullying row

Johnson ‘unwise’ but cleared of breaching code over flat refurb, report finds

Tags: Matt Hancock

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← ‘Problem with HR management’ left ‘glaring gaps’ in scheme bringing Afghan interpreters to UK ← Light in The Shadows: My book on How I Came to see Epilepsy as a Blessing
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->