• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Government lawyer rejects unionist claim that NI Protocol ‘shattered’ union

It comes after unionists started a lawsuit arguing the Brexit deal signed by Boris Johnson’s government does not respect the 1800 Acts of Union.

Andra Maciuca by Andra Maciuca
2021-11-30 16:38
in News, Politics
uk eu brexit

Photo: PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

The Northern Ireland Protocol has not “shattered” the constitutional status of Northern Ireland in the United Kingdom, as unionist politicians have claimed, a government lawyer told a court in Belfast.

It comes after unionists started a lawsuit arguing the Brexit deal signed by Boris Johnson’s government does not respect the 1800 Acts of Union.

The group of unionists includes former Labour party MP Kate Hoey, former Brexit party MEP Ben Habib and Traditional Unionist Voice leader Jim Allister.

‘Wrong’

Defending the Protocol against the group’s argument, Tony McGleenan QC completely rejected the claims.

“There has been no change to the constitutional status of Northern Ireland,” he told judges, according to The Guardian.

He added: “The suggestion that there’s been some shattering of the union is, we say, not sustainable.

 “The argument that the Act of Union has interpretative supremacy; [that] it dominates later provisions, we say that is wrong.”

RelatedPosts

Liz Truss bashed for dodging BBC interview with Nick Robinson

Supreme Court denies Jeremy Corbyn appeal in libel case

No hosepipe ban at Downing Street, despite Tory calls for rations

NHS waiting list hits record high as backlog soars by 100,000

He argued that even if the Protocol was conflicting with the 1800 law, the issues were “legally irrelevant” because the Brexit Withdrawal Act allows the Protocol to “have effect in domestic law”.

Under the Protocol, goods going from Great Britain to Northern Ireland must be checked since 1 January when Britain came out of the single market. 

The measure was put in place following a compromise between the UK and the EU to avoid an Irish border – and it means Northern Ireland stays in the UK but is also able to trade within the bloc’s single market, which means it has to respect EU rules on controlling the goods entering its territory.

But the unionists argued the Protocol is unlawful, which the high court initially rejected earlier this year, prompting an appeal against the verdict.

John Larkin QC, representing the appellants, said Brexit debates were a “distraction” because, from a legal point of view, what mattered were “the words of the statutes”.

He added Britain’s Acts of Union have legal supremacy over the Northern Ireland Protocol: “The protocol could not be validly made because it is in conflict with a provision of the constitution of the United Kingdom – that is article 6 of the Acts of Union.”

UK government choice

The legal dispute comes after last month a law professor argued it would be “objectively impossible” for the UK government to have everything it wants in relation to Brexit. 

He told TLE: “The question has been, which one of those things are you willing to sacrifice? Is it your hard Brexit? Is it peace in Ireland? Or is it unionist identity in Northern Ireland? Which of those three things do you care least about? 

“The choice made by Johnson was, we care least about the unionists in Northern Ireland, despite all of our rhetoric and our brotherly love with the DUP. That doesn’t matter, we’re going to dump Northern Ireland, and we’re going to have our hard Brexit, a new border across the island of Ireland, and the solution will be the border down the Irish Sea.”

But he said the UK’s current position is to refuse to carry out checks which it agreed to carry out on trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, which presents the EU with a “really serious dilemma”.

He said: “In that case, the single market, the Customs Union are left territorially compromised. there will be a great big hole in the frontiers of Europe, whereby goods can enter the EU, its Customs Union and single market unchecked and uncontrolled. That is simply not acceptable. 

“And yet, the only other way to solve that is to start imposing checks and controls between Northern Ireland and the Republic.”

Related: Law professor warns UK of ‘serious suffering’ from Johnson’s hard Brexit

Tags: BrexitgovernmentNorthern Ireland Protocol

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

‘Incredibly worried:’ London’s Mayor fears fire, police & NHS staffing gaps due to Omicron spread

“What is Brexit” still the most commonly searched Google query

Local government loses faith in central response

Advantages That Make Asset-Based Lending a More Preferable Financing Option

The Chamber: Film Review

Thunderball Results for Tuesday 26 April 2022 Tonight’s winning numbers

Trump’s impeachment trial shows why he must not be re-elected

Weather forecast, alerts and UVB index for London, Friday 21 August 2020

Biden could scrap London-New York air bridge in favour of Dublin

Thy Art Is Murder get Heads Rolling in Video for ‘Holy War’

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.