• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Lifestyle Health

Menstrual cups safe and effective, scientific review suggests

Preliminary evidence on the cost and waste savings associated with using menstrual cups suggests that they could be beneficial.

PA by PA
2019-07-17 14:19
in Health
credit;PA

credit;PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A scientific review of the international use of menstrual cups suggests they are safe and may be as effective as other sanitary products.

The findings indicate they result in similar or lower leakage than disposable sanitary towels (pads) or tampons.

Globally, menstruation can affect girls’ schooling and women’s experience of work, and can increase their disposition to infections if they use poor quality sanitary products.

Researchers say it can even make both women and girls a target of sexual violence or coercion when they do not have the funds to buy sanitary products.

With an increasing number of initiatives in both high- and low-income countries to combat period poverty, it is essential policy makers know what products to include in menstrual health programmes, scientists say.

Senior author Professor Penelope Phillips-Howard, from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, said: “Despite the fact that 1.9 billion women globally are of menstruating age – spending on average 65 days a year dealing with menstrual blood flow – few good quality studies exist that compare sanitary products.

“We aimed to address this by summarising current knowledge about leakage, safety, and acceptability of menstrual cups, comparing them to other products where possible.”

RelatedPosts

New prostate treatment is being rolled out across the UK

Women are almost as likely to use social media for health advice as NHS, study finds

Laurence Fox says he has Covid ‘at last’ – and is taking ivermectin

Going vegan could save the NHS at least £30 billion on ‘preventable illness’

Scientists combined data from medical studies and grey literature in which participants reported their experiences of menstrual cups or their willingness to use them.

They selected 43 studies involving 3,319 participants in both low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) – 15 studies, and high-income countries – 28 studies.

Four studies within the review (293 participants) compared leakage between different sanitary products.

The study, published in The Lancet Public Health journal, found levels were similar between menstrual cups and pads and tampons, while one found that leakage was significantly less.

In European, North American, and African women and girls, there was no increased risk of infection associated with using menstrual cups.

Results from 13 of the studies suggest around 70% of women wanted to continue using menstrual cups once they were familiar with them.

Among 69 websites containing educational materials on puberty in 27 countries, 77% mentioned disposable pads, 65% mentioned tampons, only 30% mentioned menstrual cups and 22% mentioned reusable pads, the study found.

Preliminary evidence on the cost and waste savings associated with using menstrual cups suggests that over 10 years, a single menstrual cup could cost much less than pads or tampons.

A cup could cost roughly 5% or 7% the cost of using 12 pads (on average 0.31 US Dollars each) or tampons, on average 0.21 US dollars each per period.

Plastic waste might also be reduced, as over a decade a cup is estimated to create 0.4% of the plastic waste generated by single-use pads or 6% of that produced by using tampons.

The authors note the cost and waste estimates are only illustrative, and do not account for the combined use of menstrual products, inflation, or production costs.

Given the limited number of reports on the use of menstrual cups, the authors also caution that other potential issues cannot be excluded, including use of menstrual cups in combination with IUDs.

Commenting on the study, Dr Julie Hennegan from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said: “For consumers purchasing menstrual products, the results highlight cups as a safe and cost-effective option.

“Critically, findings indicate that menstrual education resources are not providing a comprehensive overview of products to support informed choices.”

The researchers believe this was the first systematic review and meta-analysis examining girls’ and women’s experiences of menstrual cups.

However, they note the quality of the studies included was low, and call for more, quality research in this area.

Menstrual cups collect blood flow, rather than absorbing it as with pads and tampons.

Like tampons, they are inserted into the vagina, before being emptied every 4-12 hours.

There are currently two types – a vaginal cup which is generally bell-shaped, and a cervical cup.

They are made from medical grade silicone, rubber, latex or elastomer and can last up to 10 years.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/must-reads/shocking-report-highlights-extent-of-period-poverty-in-britain/07/03/

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

Tory election candidate said people on Benefits Street need ‘putting down’

Iran asks Interpol for help in arresting Donald Trump over killing of general

Turn to family – not the state – for social care help, says Sajid Javid

Brexit Party MEP worries UK will no longer have a voice in Europe in last EU parliament sitting

Ancient Welshmen helped build Stonehenge, a new study found

WATCH: New York warned ‘climate change is here’ after subway is flooded

Frugal Cooking: Method behind the madness

Jack Daniel’s To Host Film Screening Event To Launch Limited-Edition Sinatra Century

Snowden Review – London Film Festival

Let’s talk mental health – Alastair Campbell headlines photograph exhibition at Regent’s Place, London

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.