• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News Environment

Cop26: Carbon offsetting a ‘smokescreen’ to dodge climate action

Tree planting in developing nations will drive indigenous people off their land while rich countries do nothing, NGOs say.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2021-11-08 12:17
in Environment
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A coalition of human rights and environmental groups have attacked the focus on carbon offsetting by rich nations at Cop26, accusing the process of fuelling land grabs for tree planting in developing countries.

Midway through the climate summit in Glasgow, Greenpeace, Amnesty International, ActionAid and Global Witness are calling for governments to set “real” zero carbon emissions targets.

They are joined by indigenous rights body Articulacao dos Povos Indigenas do Brasil (APIB) and research organisation the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP).

‘We need real transformation’

The coalition says carbon offsetting is a scam being used as a smokescreen by developed nations to avoid reining in real terms carbon emissions in their own countries.

They said demand for land to plant the trees used in carbon offsetting schemes is forcing indigenous people off their ancestral land.

Carbon offsetting will never be able to absorb the amount of greenhouse gases countries plan to emit under their current net zero plans, the coalition said.

Teresa Anderson, climate policy coordinator at ActionAid, said: “Too many of these net zero targets rely on carbon offsetting to avoid real emission cuts, providing a convenient smokescreen to hide climate inaction.

“But growing demand for offsets will drive land grabs for new tree plantations.

“There isn’t enough available land on the planet to offset the pollution hiding in thousands of net zero pledges, and too many hopes rest on long-shot technologies that will probably never work.”

RelatedPosts

World’s biggest plastic polluter, Coca-Cola, forced to remove greenwashing packaging claims by EU

Badenoch and Farage among speakers at ‘Glastonbury for climate deniers’

Norway is on the cusp of phasing out fossil fuel cars

‘Megaberg’ twice the size of London as broken free into the ocean

She added: “To have a chance of averting climate catastrophe, we need to see real transformation, and emissions brought down to real zero.”

‘Net zero doesn’t cut it’

Seema Joshi, director of campaigns at Global Witness, said: “The biggest polluters are using net zero promises to delay climate action.

“Far-off voluntary targets and pledges to somehow offset their impacts in the future are distractions which they hope will allow them to continue to expand production of fossil fuels.”

She continued: “Net zero is not zero – if we are to have any hope of avoiding catastrophic climate breakdown, we need the big emitters to reduce greenhouse gas emissions now.”

Jennifer Morgan, executive director of Greenpeace, described carbon offsetting as “an accounting trick whereby emissions are taken off the ledger of polluters”.

“It’s time for governments and corporations to try harder: cut the greenwash and skip scams, and focus on real zero climate action plans,” she said.

Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said: “Net zero doesn’t cut it. Wealthy industrialised countries must reach zero emissions much earlier than 2050 to avoid putting an excessive burden on the most climate-vulnerable countries.

“This is not simply a humanitarian issue, it’s a legal obligation.”

Related: Fossil fuel industry has more delegates at Cop26 than any country

Tags: cop26

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Richard Ratcliffe hunger strike: How Johnson hurt Nazanin’s case ← Government sewage amendment stinks, campaigners say
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->