• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Lifestyle Health

Menstrual cups safe and effective, scientific review suggests

Preliminary evidence on the cost and waste savings associated with using menstrual cups suggests that they could be beneficial.

PA by PA
2019-07-17 14:19
in Health
credit;PA

credit;PA

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A scientific review of the international use of menstrual cups suggests they are safe and may be as effective as other sanitary products.

The findings indicate they result in similar or lower leakage than disposable sanitary towels (pads) or tampons.

Globally, menstruation can affect girls’ schooling and women’s experience of work, and can increase their disposition to infections if they use poor quality sanitary products.

Researchers say it can even make both women and girls a target of sexual violence or coercion when they do not have the funds to buy sanitary products.

With an increasing number of initiatives in both high- and low-income countries to combat period poverty, it is essential policy makers know what products to include in menstrual health programmes, scientists say.

Senior author Professor Penelope Phillips-Howard, from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, said: “Despite the fact that 1.9 billion women globally are of menstruating age – spending on average 65 days a year dealing with menstrual blood flow – few good quality studies exist that compare sanitary products.

“We aimed to address this by summarising current knowledge about leakage, safety, and acceptability of menstrual cups, comparing them to other products where possible.”

Scientists combined data from medical studies and grey literature in which participants reported their experiences of menstrual cups or their willingness to use them.

They selected 43 studies involving 3,319 participants in both low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) – 15 studies, and high-income countries – 28 studies.

RelatedPosts

How Quickly Can I Get a Doctor’s Appointment in London?

The Happiness Hormones: What They Are and How to Get More of Them

Effective Treatment Strategies for Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer: What You Should Know

Meet Healistic: The London Startup Delivering Prescriptions to Your Door in Under Two Hours

Four studies within the review (293 participants) compared leakage between different sanitary products.

The study, published in The Lancet Public Health journal, found levels were similar between menstrual cups and pads and tampons, while one found that leakage was significantly less.

In European, North American, and African women and girls, there was no increased risk of infection associated with using menstrual cups.

Results from 13 of the studies suggest around 70% of women wanted to continue using menstrual cups once they were familiar with them.

Among 69 websites containing educational materials on puberty in 27 countries, 77% mentioned disposable pads, 65% mentioned tampons, only 30% mentioned menstrual cups and 22% mentioned reusable pads, the study found.

Preliminary evidence on the cost and waste savings associated with using menstrual cups suggests that over 10 years, a single menstrual cup could cost much less than pads or tampons.

A cup could cost roughly 5% or 7% the cost of using 12 pads (on average 0.31 US Dollars each) or tampons, on average 0.21 US dollars each per period.

Plastic waste might also be reduced, as over a decade a cup is estimated to create 0.4% of the plastic waste generated by single-use pads or 6% of that produced by using tampons.

The authors note the cost and waste estimates are only illustrative, and do not account for the combined use of menstrual products, inflation, or production costs.

Given the limited number of reports on the use of menstrual cups, the authors also caution that other potential issues cannot be excluded, including use of menstrual cups in combination with IUDs.

Commenting on the study, Dr Julie Hennegan from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said: “For consumers purchasing menstrual products, the results highlight cups as a safe and cost-effective option.

“Critically, findings indicate that menstrual education resources are not providing a comprehensive overview of products to support informed choices.”

The researchers believe this was the first systematic review and meta-analysis examining girls’ and women’s experiences of menstrual cups.

However, they note the quality of the studies included was low, and call for more, quality research in this area.

Menstrual cups collect blood flow, rather than absorbing it as with pads and tampons.

Like tampons, they are inserted into the vagina, before being emptied every 4-12 hours.

There are currently two types – a vaginal cup which is generally bell-shaped, and a cervical cup.

They are made from medical grade silicone, rubber, latex or elastomer and can last up to 10 years.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/must-reads/shocking-report-highlights-extent-of-period-poverty-in-britain/07/03/

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Cambodia vows to return plastic waste shipments from US and Canada ← Possibility of no-deal Brexit ‘underpriced’, Barclay tells MPs
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->