• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Sport Football

West Ham struggling to find home comforts

Sport News 24/7 By David de Winter – Sports Editor @davidjdewinter  @TLE_Sport Six games, five defeats, 16 goals conceded – not quite the start to the season West Ham fans had in mind, especially given last term’s impressive seventh-place finish.  After leaving their beloved Boleyn Ground in order to become tenants at the Olympic Stadium […]

David de Winter by David de Winter
2016-09-29 11:21
in Football, Sport
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp
As featured on NewsNow: Sport NewsSport News 24/7

By David de Winter – Sports Editor

@davidjdewinter  @TLE_Sport

Six games, five defeats, 16 goals conceded – not quite the start to the season West Ham fans had in mind, especially given last term’s impressive seventh-place finish.  After leaving their beloved Boleyn Ground in order to become tenants at the Olympic Stadium in a controversial move, the Hammers are finding tougher than expected to adapt to their new surroundings.  So is it just a case of being a little homesick or are there deeper underlying issues to West Ham’s poor start?

Any club that moves to a new stadium finds the bedding-in process challenging.  However, this is exacerbated with clubs whose stadiums were tight to the pitch.  Remember how Arsenal struggled at first at The Emirates in 2006?  Their old Highbury ground was almost on top of the turf compared to their new home.  Similarly, Southampton struggled to adapt to St Mary’s relative spacious stadium compared to the pokey but wonderfully characterful Dell.  They consequently got relegated and dropped down to the third tier of English football before returning to the Premier League in 2012.

Embed from Getty Images

The issue for West Ham is for both supporters and players.  The squad are naturally getting used to playing in a new stadium with new pitch dimensions and with a running track in between the pitch and the fans.  Furthermore, supporters are familiarising themselves with their surroundings – where do the hardcore fans congregate, and where are the more family-friendly areas etc.  The result is a diluted atmosphere which opposition players have capitalised on.  The Boleyn ground was an intimidating prospect for any away team (and sometimes the home team) whereas now, visiting sides are exploiting the uncertainty on the pitch and in the stands.

Indeed, there have been reports of fighting amongst Hammers fans and I get the impression that, whilst the move to the Olympic Stadium makes sense financially, it is not popular with a lot of supporters.  The point is that, whilst the move might swell the coffers of the owners and the club, does it really benefit the lifeblood of the club – the fans?  As Manchester United have shown recently, a healthy balance sheet off the pitch does not necessarily translate into success on it.  I have met some ex-Hammers fans that were so disillusioned with the commercialism of the club and that they have started going to local non-league Clapton FC instead.  So what are The Irons’ owners (David Gold & David Sullivan) prioritising?  Profit or results?

Embed from Getty Images

Yet, if West Ham can ride out this current run of poor form and establish themselves at their new home, the future looks very rosy.  The club can maximise profits which will in turn make more money available to purchase better players which should see the Hammers challenging for more honours.  If Gold and Sullivan are true to their word and re-invest money in improving the squad, this can only be positive.

Speaking of which, the players must take some responsibility for recent results.  Dimitri Payet is yet to sparkle as he did last season, possibly as a result of his exertions at Euro 2016 and the defence has been woeful.  I also think West Ham overachieved in reaching Europe last season with Payet, Mark Noble and Adrian all performing brilliantly.  After a seventh-place finish in 2015/16, expectations were high that The Irons could kick on to even better things so to be languishing in the relegation zone is a bitter pill to swallow.

Embed from Getty Images

So what are the answers to West Ham’s current travails?  Firstly, key players such as Aaron Creswell (who deserved to be at the Euros with England) and Diafra Sakho are injured or unfit.  Secondly, their new signings have not gelled.  Alvaro Arbeloa is struggling to defend – something he had to do little of whilst at Real Madrid, Sofiane Feghouli has been anonymous, Simone Zaza has been useless and their most expensive signing, Andre Ayew has been injured.

I have no doubt that the Hammers will be in the Premier League next season as they have too much quality in their side to be relegated (we’ve all heard that one before).  However, everyone at the club, board members, players, management and fans alike need to be pulling in the same direction to achieve this.  At the moment West Ham are a divided club and this is showing in the performances on the pitch.  Until this is rectified, the lower echelons of the table will be their home for the foreseeable future.

RelatedPosts

MPs vote to make Premier League matches free to air

Donald Trump announces he plans to host UFC fight at the White House

Which Teams are Most Likely to Qualify for the 2026 World Cup?

Greenland application to join North American football federation rejected

Tags: featuredFootballPremier LeagueWest Ham United

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← AB InBev Takeover Means “Less Choice and Higher Prices” For Consumers ← Police officers wearing cameras have 93% fewer complaints, claims new study
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->