• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Sport

PR v Marketing at the 2014 World Cup

By Stuart Buchanan, Junior Broadcast Executive at 4mediarelations For the football mad amongst us, Friday 27th June 2014 was a day where we all rubbed our eyes, took stock for the first time in two weeks and, once the haze had cleared, asked ‘Where’s the football gone?’ For football-widows and those just generally not interested in watching […]

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2014-06-27 16:14
in Sport
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

By Stuart Buchanan, Junior Broadcast Executive at 4mediarelations

For the football mad amongst us, Friday 27th June 2014 was a day where we all rubbed our eyes, took stock for the first time in two weeks and, once the haze had cleared, asked ‘Where’s the football gone?’

For football-widows and those just generally not interested in watching millionaires battering a sheep’s bladder around a field, the one day’s respite is sweet relief. Today is the first time in two weeks that there has been no World Cup games as the group stages turn into the knockout rounds. But in terms of marketing and advertising, it’s the first chance to truly calculate how well their ‘World Cup Brazil 2014’-related broadcast campaigns have sunk in and registered within the conscious of the global viewing public.

As you’d expect nowadays, the opening two weeks of the tournament saw some of the world’s biggest brands levering themselves into the ad breaks, pitch-side hoardings and developing associated hashtags as the battle for attention began.

The likes of Adidas, Emirates, Visa and Castrol went in the favourites – their official tie-ins with FIFA guaranteeing them airtime around the world at key broadcast points.

A few weeks back, we looked at how a simple PR campaign that reacts to, or incorporates a news story can, in today’s world of social media, generate as much interest in a product as an official tie-in. Opticians Specsavers and betting firm Paddy Power have created some interesting (and often highly successful) interpretations of this ideal in the past.

In fact, recent research from ‘Unruly’ backs-up the idea that official partnerships no longer guarantee the big money. The most shared advertising video of the World Cup so far have come from some altogether unexpected sources.

Yoghurt-peddlers Danone have created a video for their ‘Activia’ brand which has, so far, garnered 3.9 million views since its release, despite featuring no football and a singer from Brazil’s neighbours Colombia, Shakira – although her World Cup song ‘La La La (Brazil 2014)’, featured in the video.

Further to that, non-sponsor Nike (whose video polled 2nd in the list) more than tripled direct-rivals and official sponsors, Adidas – with Nike’s 2.3m compared to Adidas’ 770,000 views.

RelatedPosts

Which Teams are Most Likely to Qualify for the 2026 World Cup?

Greenland application to join North American football federation rejected

‘Diving audit’ finds male footballers ‘far more likely’ to simulate than women

Headwinds for UK Betting Companies as Ireland Changes Betting Regulation

The third most popular video came from another non-sponsor, in the form of Samsung’s ‘#Galaxy11’ campaign.

Whilst the highest performing videos featured well-known faces, names and locations, they didn’t enjoy the prime-time placement their similarly ‘celeb-heavy’ counterpoints did.

Effectively, the message coming out of this research is that a well created, clever PR drive can easily out-strip official marketing tie-ins. Consumers are willing to search for a more enjoyable video than those are presented to them as an official package…well, once they’ve taken their eyes of the action.

Please login to join discussion

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← A lack of leadership on the left ← What happens with Brexit?
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->