• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Property

Stargazer might have to tear down home-made observatory after neighbours complain about glare

A keen stargazer faces tearing down his home-made observatory after neighbours complain the glare from the dome means they have to wear sunglasses inside their own home.

SWNS by SWNS
2019-10-18 12:37
in Property
Credit;SWNS

Credit;SWNS

FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A keen stargazer who built an observatory in his back garden may have to tear it down after neighbours complained the glare from it means they have to wear sunglasses inside their own home.

Melvyn Thurlbourn built his home-made observatory, which stands at 12ft (3.7m) high, back in 2017 when he mounted a large white dome on top of a garden shed.

However, after applying for a retrospective planning application this year, his neighbours objected, meaning the council have since rejected Mr Thurlbourn’s application.

A neighbour told the council that they can’t enjoy spending time in their garden without wearing sunglasses because of the “highly reflective glare” caused by the dome’s white fibreglass material.

They also complained that becasue of the reflective glare they even have to wear sunglasses inside their own home unless they shut the curtains.

Mr Thurlbourn, from St Ives, Cambridgeshire, had offered to paint the dome matt grey and to put plants in to help disguise the telescope-holding building, however a council planner from Huntingdon District Council, said the proposals would not reduce the over-bearing nature of the building.

They said, as the the dome projects above the fence line by approximately 5ft9 (1.8m), it creates an “overbearing impact” to the rear garden on Abbots Crescent, and can even been seen by the public from the street.

They also branded the dome “un-neighbourly” and “incongruous” due to its’ proximity to the neighbouring garden.

They said: “This type of development, while only for personal use of the applicant, is not the type of structure you would normally expect to see in this residential location.

RelatedPosts

Vision 2030 in Action: NHC Leads Saudi Arabia’s Real Estate Transformation

The rise of London’s ‘little coin neighbourhoods’: Ten hidden gems for savvy buyers

Advantages of Submersible Water Pumps and Resilient Sump Pumps

NatWest launches Family-Backed Mortgage to help kids flee the nest 

“Given the scale, bulk and design of the observatory dome it is considered to be an incongruous form of development and un-neighbourly given its location and height in close proximity to neighbouring garden.”

The town’s civic society added: “The white dome is in very close proximity to the boundary of three neighbours and is so close there is little possibility of the applicant using tree or hedge screening to mitigate the view.

“Consequently, and in view of the height and stark appearance of the dome the society’s view is the application is overbearing.”

Meanwhile, St Ives Town Council have approved the plan and welcomed Mr Thurlbourn’s offer to paint the observatory and plant screening.

A statement submitted in support of the application said the surface shape of the dome could not reflect light in the same way as a garden greenhouse could without restriction, as was suggested by Mr Thurlbourn’s neighbour.

Homeowner’s horror as front of property is ripped off by the force of a burst water main

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Two unrelated students called Bronte Taylor, born one day apart, graduated from same English Literature course this week ← Angela Merkel says extension is “unavoidable” if MPs vote down deal
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->