• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Starmer: No impact assessment carried out on winter fuel payment cut

The Prime Minister said he had not received a report setting out the impact of the decision to means-test the payments.

David Hughes by David Hughes
2024-09-13 07:56
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Sir Keir Starmer said “there isn’t a report on my desk” showing the impact of his Government’s decision to strip winter fuel payments from millions of pensioners.

Downing Street confirmed that a full impact assessment of the change had not been carried out.

The Prime Minister and Chancellor Rachel Reeves decided to means-test the payments, worth up to £300, to help fill a £22 billion “black hole” in the public finances.

From this winter, only people on pension credit or certain other benefits will receive the payments in England and Wales.

The Government has been under pressure from the Tories to publish an impact assessment of the plan, which will reduce the number of recipients from about 10.8 million last winter to an estimated 1.5 million this year, saving £1.3 billion.

Pressed on whether an impact assessment would be published, Sir Keir told reporters travelling with him to Washington DC: “There isn’t a report on my desk which somehow we’re not showing, that I’m not showing, as simple as that.”

He said the Government was not legally required to produce one.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said some statistical work had been done, but nothing on what impact the change might have on vulnerable pensioners.

“There are clear rules on this that we followed carefully and, for policy changes implemented through secondary legislation, like the change to winter fuel payment eligibility, departments are required to make regulatory impact assessments if the cost of the legislation exceeds £10 million and so an assessment was therefore not required for the change to winter fuel eligibility.”

RelatedPosts

Zia Yusuf called out for unfounded claim on asylum seekers

Jacob Rees-Mogg says Angela Rayner has ‘rizz’

Elon Musk’s claim that ‘the left is murderously violent’ debunked… by his own AI

Resigned, suspended, expelled: Reform lose NINE councillors in just six weeks

There was a legal duty to consider the “equality implications” of any policy development and “that happened in the usual way to assess the proportion of protected characteristics, such as age and gender who claim winter fuel payments”.

And there was also an official statistical publication which set out the estimated number of households in fuel poverty.

But the spokeswoman confirmed there had been no work on how many people affected by the change might have health difficulties or might be vulnerable or at risk as a result of the change.

Asked whether an assessment should have been done to work out whether elderly people might die as a result of the change, the spokeswoman said: “The Government will be ensuring that those who are most vulnerable and should be receiving support are receiving it, and that’s why there is a huge effort to try and convert people onto pension credit.

“And also, we want people to be applying for the wider support, which is also there for the most vulnerable.

“Our approach is to ensure that those most vulnerable are receiving targeted support, and we’ve had to take that tough decision to rebalance the books, given the state of the public finances.”

In 2017, Labour claimed Conservative plans to means-test the winter fuel allowance could lead to almost 4,000 deaths.

Related: Policing minister’s handbag stolen at police conference

Tags: keir starmer

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Policing minister’s handbag stolen at police conference ← Elon Musk’s daughter responds to his ‘disgusting’ Taylor Swift post
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->