• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Johnson criticised but cleared over handling of Mustique holiday controversy

The Commons Committee on Standards said it was “regrettable” that a full explanation of the funding of the Mustique trip had not been provided long ago.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2021-07-08 10:04
in Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Boris Johnson was found to have breached the code of conduct by the Commons Standards Commissioner over a luxury Caribbean holiday – but MPs ultimately overruled the finding.

Kathryn Stone said the Prime Minister breached the MPs’ code by having not “fulfilled conscientiously” the requirements for registering the £15,000 accommodation on Mustique paid for by a Tory donor.

But MPs on the Commons Committee on Standards said in a critical report published on Thursday that they did not agree with her conclusion “in light of additional evidence”, and cleared him of the allegation.

They said Carphone Warehouse founder David Ross was the donor as stated so the Prime Minister’s “register entry is accurate and complete”, but they did express criticism of Mr Johnson.

The MPs said it was “regrettable” that a full explanation of the situation was not provided long ago, saying the matter could have been “concluded many months ago if more strenuous efforts had been made to dispel the uncertainty”.

Ms Stone said it was “unusually difficult to find the facts” about the holiday during her investigation, which lasted more than a year.

She said she could not find “any reliable documentary” that clearly outlined how the trip with wife Carrie between December 26 2019 and January 5 last year was paid for.

The commissioner said Mr Johnson was required as an MP to “conscientiously” fulfil the requirement to update the register of members’ financial interests.

But she said it was “surprising” he did not establish further facts when he learned he would not be staying in Mr Ross’s villa as expected but another property arranged by the donor.

RelatedPosts

Reform MP brags she ‘knows what it is like to hire and fire’ employees

Rachel Reeves ‘cries’ at PMQs after welfare chaos

Keir Starmer urged to apologise to disabled people after welfare chaos

Stop Brexit Steve confronts minister on £40bn EU blackhole

“Because he did not make sufficient inquiries to establish the full facts about the funding arrangements for his free accommodation, either before his holiday, as he should have done, or in 2020, I find that Mr Johnson has not fulfilled conscientiously the House’s requirements for registration,” she said.

This was in breach of the code of conduct, Ms Stone said, adding: “I also find that Mr Johnson has not shown the accountability required of those in public life.”

Mr Johnson rejected the commissioner’s finding and provided written evidence to the Commons committee chaired by Labour MP Chris Bryant.

Having received new information, the committee said it reached a different conclusion from Ms Stone – though did not criticise her findings, which were based on “the evidence available to her at the time”.

The MPs received “the missing explanation” in the form of confirmation from the former owners of the holiday villa that they were paid by the Mustique Company that manages the island.

The committee said the funding arrangements were “ad hoc and informal, and do not appear to have been fully explained to Mr Johnson at the outset”.

The report added: “By Mr Johnson’s and Mr Ross’s own admission, the arrangements for funding Mr Johnson’s holiday accommodation were ad hoc and informal, and do not appear to have been fully explained to Mr Johnson at the outset.

“This matter could have been concluded many months ago if more strenuous efforts had been made to dispel the uncertainty.

“Given that Mr Johnson was twice reprimanded by our predecessor committee in the last Parliament in the space of four months for ‘an over-casual attitude towards obeying the rules of the House’, we would have expected him to have gone the extra mile to ensure there was no uncertainty about the arrangements.

“It is regrettable that a full account and explanation of the funding arrangements for Mr Johnson’s holiday accommodation has only come to light as a result of our own inquiries rather than at an earlier stage.

“If greater clarity had been made available to the Commissioner at the first instance, this matter could have been cleared up many months ago.”

The finding came after ministerial standards adviser Lord Geidt found Mr Johnson had acted “unwisely” in allowing the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat to go ahead without “more rigorous regard for how this would be funded”.

But he was ultimately cleared of breaching the ministerial code in that instance.

Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said: “This whole murky affair shows Boris Johnson has a casual relationship with the truth and a flagrant disregard for the most basic standards of integrity and trustworthiness that we would expect from a Prime Minister.

“The way Johnson handles his personal finances mirrors the way he governs the country – chaos and confusion.”

Related: Gary Neville makes brutal Boris dig as he credits Southgate’s leadership

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Sunak hints that triple lock on pensions could be unlocked ← Hungarian authorities issue fine over children’s book featuring same-sex parents
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->