Nearly one in five less advantaged parents say a lack of food made home-learning more difficult for children in the first lockdown, a survey suggests. It comes as the Government has promised to investigate after images shared online showed “woefully inadequate” free school meal parcels sent to families.
Children’s Minister Vicky Ford said she would be “urgently” look into the matter after one mother posted an image of a £30 parcel which was estimated to contain just over £5 worth of food.
Footballer Marcus Rashford Tweeted his disgust.
Another Twitter user shared a picture of her free school meals bag.
Sharing the image, Twitter user Roadside Mum said: “2 days jacket potato with beans, 8 single cheese sandwiches, 2 days carrots, 3 days apples, 2 days soreen, 3 days frubes.
“Spare pasta & tomato. Will need mayo for pasta salad.
“Issued instead of £30 vouchers. I could do more with £30 to be honest.”
Parents of children from families of lower socioeconomic status were more likely to report that aspects of their home environment – such as a lack of technology, space and adequate internet – made it harder for pupils to complete schoolwork from home, according to the University of Sussex study.
It came as pupils in schools and colleges in England – except children of key workers and vulnerable pupils – have been told to learn remotely until mid-February amid the new national lockdown.
Researchers warn that educational inequalities are likely to increase due to school closures as the study suggests that a switch to home learning can disproportionately disrupt the education of the most disadvantaged pupils.
The survey, of 3,409 parents in the UK, suggests that secondary school pupils eligible for free school meals (39%) were more likely to report that a lack of technology – such as laptops and computers – made learning from home more difficult, compared to 19% of pupils who are not eligible for free school meals.
It suggests primary school pupils from struggling households were more likely to find home learning learning harder than their more comfortable peers due to the environment – such as noise levels (59% to 50%), lack of space (45% to 22%), lack of technology (45% to 26%) and lack of internet (35% to 16%).
The survey, which ran from May 5 until July 31, also found that 19% of parents of primary school pupils from households that were struggling for income said a lack of food made completing school work from home more difficult, compared to just 3% of families with comfortable levels of income.
Lead researcher Dr Matthew Easterbrook, senior lecturer in psychology at the University of Sussex, said: “This suggests that for some children, when the most basic of needs are not being met, their education can suffer.
“These results show that school closures disproportionately disrupt the education of those who are most economically disadvantaged, suggesting that educational inequalities are likely to rise because of the pandemic.”
He added: “The results show that parents of pupils from disadvantaged families – those who are eligible for free school meals, who have lower levels of education, or who are financially struggling – are much more likely to report that learning from home is challenging.”
The study also found that boys were more likely to do fewer hours of home learning than girls during school closures in the first lockdown.
Gender differences were most evident in secondary pupils, where girls were twice as likely to be very motivated with their home learning than boys.
Report co-author Lewis Doyle, doctoral researcher at the University of Sussex, said: “School closures, while clearly necessary during this public health crisis, risk entrenching inequality.”
A Government spokeswoman said: “We are acutely aware of the additional challenges faced by disadvantaged children during this crisis and have put significant support in place to help resolve this.
“We have purchased over a million laptops and tablets for the pupils who need it most, created a £1 billion Covid catch up fund to make up for lost time in education and provided families with billions of welfare support, including through the £170 million Covid Winter Grant Scheme.”
Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said last week that children who do not have access to technology are seen as vulnerable and can attend school in-person during the new national lockdown.
Government guidance says vulnerable children may include “pupils who may have difficulty engaging with remote education at home” due to a lack of devices or quiet space to study.
But campaigners are threatening legal action against the Government if it fails to step up its efforts to ensure all children can access remote education.
On Wednesday last week, Mr Williamson told MPs that three-quarters-of-a-million laptops and tablets will have been delivered by the end of this week to help pupils access online learning.
A national voucher scheme will be in place so all eligible children can access free school meals, he said.
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .