• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Rachel Riley loses latest libel battle against pro-Corbyn blogger

A pro-Corbyn blogger has won an appeal in his libel battle against the Countdown presenter.

Henry Goodwin by Henry Goodwin
2021-05-14 15:59
in News
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Rachel Riley has lost the latest round of a libel battle with a political blogger and Jeremy Corbyn supporter over an article which alleged that she engaged in a “campaign of online abuse and harassment” against a teenager on Twitter.

Riley, 35, the numbers expert on the Channel 4 show Countdown, sued Mike Sivier after he published an article on his website Vox Political in January 2019 with the headline: “Serial abuser Rachel Riley to receive ‘extra protection’ – on grounds that she is receiving abuse”.

Mr Sivier defended what he had published, arguing that it was “substantially true”, honest opinion, and a matter of public interest.

A High Court judge had ruled in favour of Ms Riley and struck out Sivier’s defences.

Mrs Justice Collins Rice concluded that he had “no prospect” of succeeding at a trial, but Mr Sivier on Friday won an appeal.

Three Court of Appeal judges ruled that Mr Sivier’s public interest defence should be assessed at a trial.

“I would allow the appeal,” said one appeal judge, Lord Justice Warby, in a written ruling. “I would set aside the order striking out the defence of publication on matter of public interest.”

RelatedPosts

Campaign launched to keep the lights on at Britain’s biggest food bank

Water firms sold off reservoirs that could have helped ease drought

Government considering ’70s-style blackouts in January

Thames Water to announce hosepipe ban imminently

He added: “In my view, the appropriate course is for the public interest defence to be assessed at a trial.”

The two other appeal judges, Lord Justice Henderson and Dame Victoria Sharp, said they agreed.

Ms Riley is waiting to hear whether she has won a separate damages fight after suing a former aide to Jeremy Corbyn for libel.

She sued Laura Murray, 32, over a tweet posted two years ago.

A High Court judge finished overseeing a three-day trial at the High Court in London earlier this week.

Mr Justice Nicklin is expected to publish a ruling in the near future.

Ms Riley’s dispute with Mr Sivier centres on tweets posted as part of an online debate on anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, some of which were exchanged between Ms Riley and a Twitter user who identified herself as a 16-year-old called Rose.

The TV presenter has told how she is Jewish, has a “hatred of anti-Semitism”, speaks out against it and thinks the Corbyn-led Labour Party was “fostering anti-Semitism”.

Ms Riley, who studied mathematics at Oxford University, had asked Mrs Justice Collins Rice to strike out Mr Sivier’s defences before the case went to trial.

Mrs Justice Collins Rice granted her application, and said that, contrary to allegations in Mr Sivier’s article, Ms Riley’s online discussion with Rose was a “straightforward, rational and respectful exchange of views”.

The judge also said there was no evidence that the presenter had encouraged any of her 600,000 followers to harass Rose, and she was not responsible for any abuse the teenager received.

Lawyers representing Mr Sivier say his article addressed “matters of public interest” – online bullying and harassment, and the power of an adult celebrity compared with the relative powerlessness of a vulnerable child suffering anxiety, mental health and anti-Semitism.

Appeal judges said a defendant relying on a public interest defence must establish a belief that publishing a statement was in the public interest, and that the belief was reasonable.

They concluded that the “appropriate time and place” for an evaluation of issues raised was at a trial. Mr Sivier’s appeal against the dismissal of his “truth and honest opinion” defences was dismissed.

Related: ‘Anarchy rules in the UK’: Mail readers aren’t happy about the Glasgow protests

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

COVID-19 crisis has created perfect storm for many charities

Viral vid slams Shapps’ defence of PM: ‘The Ministerial code is clear HE MUST RESIGN’

Burger chain Byron to slash 651 jobs and shut 31 restaurants

TesseracT debut video for ‘King’ ahead of new album Sonder release

Scandal Italy Shatters Records: How Did They Do It?

Covid cases hit 6,000 for first time since start of May as toilet roll sales rise again

New research unveils London’s key property selling points of 2018

Boris Johnson wears England shirt over his shirt and tie – Twitter reacts

Ambulance splattered with flour and eggs while attending to an emergency

Brexiteer MP Liam Fox progresses to next round in race to be WTO chief

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.