Quarrying of the ‘bluestones’ used at Stonehenge took place 180 miles away in Wales 5,000 years ago, according to a new study.
The research, published in the journal Antiquity, pinpoints the exact locations of two of the quarries, and reveals when and how the stones were quarried.
Excavations at two Welsh quarries – known to be the source of the Stonehenge ‘bluestones’ – have provided new evidence of megalith quarrying around 3000 BC.
And the discovery takes archaeologists “a step closer” to unlocking the iconic landmark’s greatest mystery – why its stones came from so far away.
Geologists have long known that 42 of Stonehenge’s smaller stones, known as bluestones, came from the Preseli hills in Pembrokeshire.
The latest discovery has been made by a team of archaeologists and geologists from University College London (UCL), Bournemouth University, University of Southampton, University of the Highlands and Islands and National Museum of Wales.
The team has been investigating the sites for eight years.
Team leader Professor Mike Parker Pearson, of UCL, said: “What’s really exciting about these discoveries is that they take us a step closer to unlocking Stonehenge’s greatest mystery – why its stones came from so far away.
“Every other Neolithic monument in Europe was built of megaliths brought from no more than 10 miles away.
“We’re now looking to find out just what was so special about the Preseli hills 5,000 years ago, and whether there were any important stone circles here, built before the bluestones were moved to Stonehenge.”
The largest quarry was found almost 180 miles from Stonehenge on the outcrop of Carn Goedog, on the north slope of the Preseli hills.
Geologist Dr Richard Bevins, of the National Museum of Wales, said: “This was the dominant source of Stonehenge’s spotted dolerite, so-called because it has white spots in the igneous blue rock.
“At least five of Stonehenge’s bluestones, and probably more, came from Carn Goedog.”
In the valley below Carn Goedog, another outcrop at Craig Rhos-y-felin was identified by Dr Bevins and fellow geologist Dr Rob Ixer, of UCL, as the source of one of the types of rhyolite – another type of igneous rock – found at Stonehenge.
The new study suggests that the bluestone outcrops are formed of natural, vertical pillars which could be eased off the rock face by opening up the vertical joints between each pillar.
Unlike stone quarries in ancient Egypt, where obelisks were carved out of the solid rock, the researchers said that the Welsh quarries were easier to exploit.
They said Neolithic quarry workers needed only to insert wedges into the ready-made joints between pillars, then lower each pillar to the foot of the outcrop.
Although most of their equipment is likely to have consisted of perishable ropes and wooden wedges, mallets and levers, they left behind other tools such as hammer stones and stone wedges.
Prof Parker Pearson added: “The stone wedges are made of imported mudstone, much softer than the hard dolerite pillars.
“An engineering colleague has suggested that hammering in a hard wedge could have created stress fractures, causing the thin pillars to crack.
“Using a soft wedge means that, if anything were to break, it would be the wedge and not the pillar.”
Archaeological excavations at the foot of both outcrops uncovered the remains of man-made stone and earth platforms, with each platform’s outer edge terminating in a vertical drop of about a metre.
Professor Colin Richards, of the University of the Highlands and Islands, has excavated Britain’s only other identified megalith quarry in the Orkney islands, off the north coast of Scotland.
He said: “Bluestone pillars could be eased down onto this platform, which acted as a loading bay for lowering them onto wooden sledges before dragging them away.”
An important aim of the team was to date megalith-quarrying at the two outcrops.
In the soft sediment of a hollowed-out track leading from the loading bay at Craig Rhos-y-felin, and on the artificial platform at Carn Goedog, the team recovered pieces of charcoal dating to around 3000 BC.
The team now thinks that Stonehenge was initially a circle of rough, unworked bluestone pillars set in pits known as the Aubrey Holes, near Stonehenge, and that the sarsens, or sandstone blocks, were added some 500 years later.
The new discoveries also cast doubt on a popular theory that the bluestones were transported by sea to Stonehenge.
Professor Kate Welham, of Bournemouth University, said: “Some people think that the bluestones were taken southwards to Milford Haven and placed on rafts or slung between boats and then paddled up the Bristol Channel and along the Bristol Avon towards Salisbury Plain.
“But these quarries are on the north side of the Preseli hills so the megaliths could have simply gone overland all the way to Salisbury Plain.”
By Stephen Beech
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .