• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Care home leaders reject Hancock’s claims that government protected them

"It was frightening. If it weren’t for the hard work of social care staff, those figures would have been much, much worse.”

Andra Maciuca by Andra Maciuca
2021-05-30 13:48
in News, Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Care home leaders have rejected Matt Hancock’s claims the government threw a ‘protective ring’ around them in the early stages of coronavirus crisis, The Independent has reported.

Mike Padgham, the chairman of the Independent Care Group, representing providers in York and North Yorkshire, said care homes were “forgotten” at the start of the pandemic.

It comes as the health secretary is facing increasing pressure over his treatment of care home residents.

Some were discharged from hospital and sent back to their care homes without being tested for Covid-19 in the early parts of last year.

Former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings accused Mr Hancock of lying to the prime minister over this issue when he gave evidence to MPs last week, adding that the suggestion care homes were shielded were “complete nonsense”.

Mr Padgham told Sky News: “We had someone who was transferred to us from hospital on 19 March,” he said.

Frightening

“At that time, we thought testing was happening, in fact we found it wasn’t and we actually had to go and get the test ourselves from the hospital to make sure that they weren’t positive. By the time we got the test, they were readmitted back and unfortunately passed away.”

“We were worried because we saw the NHS was dealing with a very difficult issue, they had PPE, we didn’t and we were reassuring our staff and our residents that we knew what was happening and doing the best we possibly could but it was frightening. And if it weren’t for the hard work of social care staff, and in fact the local authorities in our area, those figures (of deaths in care homes) I am confident would have been much, much worse.”

He added: “I don’t believe myself there was a ring of protection thrown round us.”

RelatedPosts

Bob Vylan album surges up the charts after Glastonbury controversy

‘He’s done nothing’: Nigel Farage accused of only using Clacton ‘for photo opportunities’

‘They can’t organise a p*ss-up in a brewery’ – Steve Coogan rips into Reform

Police arrest 83-year-old priest holding placard in support of Palestine Action

Mr Hancock told a Downing Street press conference that “right from the start we have tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes”.

Vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi defended Mr Hancock, telling the BBC’s Andrew Marr show “the government absolutely threw a protective ring around care homes.”

Correspondence

The Sunday Times reports that social care leaders wrote to Mr Hancock on 26 March last year to warning him care homes were being “pressured” into taking patients who had not been tested and who had symptoms of coronavirus.

The email, sent by Lisa Lenton, the then chairwoman of the Care Provider Alliance, which represents thousands of care homes, told the health secretary managers were “terrified” a lack of testing was causing outbreaks in homes.

The Sunday Telegraph also reported that guidance from Mr Hancock’s department ordered hospitals to discharge patients without any mention of a need to test them first.

Related: ‘Matt Hancock is not telling the truth’: Reactions as health secretary responds to testing allegations

Best tweets as Matt Hancock was ‘busy saving lives’ during Cummings’ evidence

Tags: Care homesMatt Hancock

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← EU says it is not punishing UK through NI after DUP accusations ← Australia trade deal set to include another controversial policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->