• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Lifestyle Discussion

Who looks down on who?

Ok, the title is weird, and the grammar is poor, but try this. Look at your friends who are in couples. Check out their heights (I’m talking hetro pairs here). How many gals are taller than the guys? That’s right! I thought so! As close to zero as you can get. The occasional one who […]

Guest Contributor by Guest Contributor
2017-12-10 18:34
in Discussion, Lifestyle
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

Ok, the title is weird, and the grammar is poor, but try this. Look at your friends who are in couples. Check out their heights (I’m talking hetro pairs here). How many gals are taller than the guys? That’s right! I thought so! As close to zero as you can get. The occasional one who isn’t, really stands out (think Mr Speaker in Parliament, the charming John Bercow, with his delightful missus, Sally). I’ve surreptitiously surveyed several chums that I know, worked out the statistics, and, guess what? They all follow the pattern. The possibility of that happening by chance, for the mathematically inclined, is about as low as a possibility can possibly be. In other words, zilch.

So, Janes are smaller than their Johns. And we purposely reinforce this profile, for example in the artificial world of “Strictly” (have a peep, if you can stomach it); and “Bond girls”; and way, way back into cinema history – any stars with iron fists, square jaws and XY chromosomes who happened to be on the short side, had even shorter, cutesy co-stars with XX chromosomes. Or, as legend has it, stood on boxes. Now, in ballroom there might be a bit of a point (the lads generally do a lot of twirling of the lasses, underarm) – but that can’t have had an impact on human evolution over just a few centuries. My hunch is, anyway, looking at the traditions of original peoples in the Americas and Africa, back in the day, there was probably a lot more of what we now call circle dance i.e. nothing like the modern European, mixed-sex, hand-holding, body-flaunting, buttock-rolling, leg-lifting fol-de-rol.

Anyway, forget all the waltzing and foxtrotting, that’s a distraction. Perhaps the reason for this consistently, uber-neat, small-tall matching rigmarole, is that females in the stone age simply chose the biggest males, to look up to and protect them from the wild beasties. And we kind of evolved to carry on selecting by elevation. But that can’t be the real explanation either, or we’d see lots of 5ft girlfriends with 6ft boyfriends. And there aren’t. 5ft ladies are pretty reliably matched with 5ft 2in gentlemen. In other words, the chaps are always just a couple of inches taller (or a few cm, for you metric moaners).

So here’s the thing. Maybe the explanation is more to do with the male ego. We just aren’t comfortable with taller women. We, the fragile fellas, choose our (smaller) partners, subconsciously, to bolster our soggy sense of self: to have someone to look down on. We do man height-ing.

Words by Nigel Mellor is author of Peace and War if you would like to read it click here

RelatedPosts

How Quickly Can I Get a Doctor’s Appointment in London?

People are celebrating the anniversary of the ‘least accurate thing anyone ever wrote about Brexit’

The Happiness Hormones: What They Are and How to Get More of Them

Austria for entrepreneurs: A smart move for English-speaking EU business owners

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Vice-Chancellor of Bath Uni faced calls to leave job immediately from 71 professors citing concerns about the “reputational crisis” surrounding her pay  ← Stoke City & Burton Albion clash after friendly
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->