• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • FAQ
  • Meet the Team
  • About The London Economic
  • Advertise
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Business and Economics

These are the firms which have rejected the government’s job retention bonus

Big business must play an active role in the recovery - these are the firms which are helping out.

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
July 20, 2020
in Business and Economics

Several British firms have moved to reject the offer of a job retention bonus from Chancellor Rishi Sunak in a bid to aid the country’s recovery.

Earlier this month the government promised to pay companies £1,000 for each employee if they take back the staff that they sent home as part of the scheme.

The jobs retention bonus will be paid to companies if they keep the employee in work until January, and pay them at least £520 per month, on average.

If all furloughed workers are taken back by their employer the scheme will cost the Government £9 billion, the Chancellor said.

Rejecting the bonus

But, amid warnings from MPs and economists that the bonus money could be claimed for staff that would have been returned from furlough anyway, several firms have moved to reject the offer – admitting that they don’t need the cash.

Despite enduring one of the gravest recessions in history, many firms have managed to weather the storm and, as such, feel morally obliged not to take taxpayer handouts.

The government has welcomed the move, although encouraged employers to use the bonus if they need it.

RelatedPosts

Government advertorials claim success as factory output slows in Feb amid Brexit and Covid supply chain woes

Brexit: Bank of England boss warns EU over ‘serious escalation’ in financial services grab

Boardroom battle at Danone sees two schools of capitalism go head-to-head

‘Roadmap or not, I feel completely abandoned’ – small business owners slam Government

Here is the confirmed list of businesses which have been fortunate enough to help out:

Primark

Primark led the way in rejecting around £30 million in bonus payments for bringing furloughed staff back into work amid signs of encouraging sales.

The high street retailer was praised for doing its bit to protect the public purse after it moved to shun the £1,000 bonus for its 30,000 staff.

Last year it made profits of more than £900 million, with owner Associated British Foods (ABF) saying sales have been “encouraging” after reopening sites, despite predicting a major hit to profits.

Only eight of the 375 Primark stores have not yet reopened, with reports of “reassuring” trade from stores which have welcomed customers again.

It said sales in the first week of reopening in England and Wales were “ahead of the same week last year” after raking in £133 million from customers.

Rightmove 

Rightmove followed suit after furloughing 160 employees after the coronavirus crisis hit. It would have been eligible to claim £160,000 in bonus payments had it applied.

However, it said: “Now that the housing market has reopened across all parts of the UK we’re in a fortunate position that by the end of July all of our furloughed employees will be back at work, and therefore we will not need to make use of the furlough bonus scheme.”

John Lewis

John Lewis, which furloughed 14,000 shop workers at the start of the crisis, is also not expected to make use of the scheme. However, it is understood to be waiting for the government guidance to come out at the end of the month before it makes a firm decision.

Last week the retailer announced that eight of its 50 stores will not reopen after the pandemic.

Barratt Homes

Barratt Homes has pledged to pay back and reject government bonuses as construction sites were reopened.

A Barratt spokesman said: “All of our employees, other than those shielding, have returned from furlough, and Barratt will not be using the Job Retention Bonus Scheme.”

Redrow

Redrow joined Barratt Homes in rejecting the bonus as construction starts up again.

A spokesman for Redrow said: ‘We will not be looking into, or utilising, the Government’s Job Retention Bonus.’

Compass

Compass could have claimed up to £21 million for bringing some 21,000 staff back to work, but rejected the offer as the firm started to get back on its feet.

William Hill

According to the Sunday Times, William Hill joined Primark early on in rejecting the job retention bonus payment.

Related: America: The lost superpower

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending fromTLE

  • All
  • trending

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

Stress, fear and homelessness: The threat looming over families confronted with eviction

File photo dated 07/11/03 of a prison cell.

The Other Prison Pandemic

Latest from TLE

Glasgow Film Festival 2021

Set For Life Results Monday 1st March 2021

Influencer tries to blag a free meal – ends up at police station

More Cronyism? PR firm with Tory links provides test and trace ‘reputation management’

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: jack@thelondoneconomic.com

Commercial enquiries, please contact: advertise@thelondoneconomic.com

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech & Auto
  • About The London Economic
  • Meet the Team
  • Privacy policy

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.