• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • FAQ
  • Meet the Team
  • About The London Economic
  • Advertise
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Business and Economics

Government structure the ‘real source of loan scheme problems’

It is a "classic example of trying to be too clever and forgetting what you are meant to achieve".

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
April 16, 2020
in Business and Economics

By Jack Peat and David Sefton

The government’s structure of the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme has been blamed for a lack of vital funds reaching firms.

Despite claiming to be guaranteeing 80 per cent of loans to small and medium sized companies, the reality is that it is subject to “per-lender cap on claims” of 60 per cent of overall losses on loans by each lender. 

It seems that the government either hoped no one would notice this or that it would not matter. But they are wrong on both counts.

Trying to be too clever

A senior executive at one loan provider, working with the British Business Bank to help deliver the scheme, told The London Economic that the “per-lender cap is a classic example of trying to be too clever and forgetting what you are meant to achieve”.

When a lender assesses a potential loan, it has no way of knowing at that point what the default rate will be on all the other loans it is making, so it has to apply the same guarantee assumption across them all. 

As it is applying a rate across a portfolio, the bank will therefore look at a potential loan on the basis that only 60 per cent of is backed by the government and not 80 per cent.

RelatedPosts

Mario Draghi: Italy’s chance to reboot its economy

Government advertorials claim success as factory output slows in Feb amid Brexit and Covid supply chain woes

Brexit: Bank of England boss warns EU over ‘serious escalation’ in financial services grab

Boardroom battle at Danone sees two schools of capitalism go head-to-head

It’s not difficult to see that the more risk the banks take on loans, the more careful they will be about who to lend to, and the fewer loans they will make and the longer they will take to consider the risks.

Hence we are in a situation where three weeks after announcement fewer than 1 per cent of businesses that would like loans have received them. Not so much “whatever it takes” as “whatever….”.

Swiss approach

Contrast that with the Swiss approach where the state is guaranteeing 100 per cent of loans for up to 10 per cent of turnover and you arrive at a more appealing model.

Matthias Knaur, who runs businesses in the UK and Switzerland, told the Financial Times that it took “only a minute or two to complete and scan the single-page form for a liquidity lifeline from the Swiss government. About 30 minutes after sending it, the money was in his company’s account.”

In the UK, after days of phone calls the company’s application for an emergency loan was denied.

Commenting on the stark divide he said: “The backbone of all these economies are SMEs and they need money now. I don’t think politicians are aware of the magnitude of this.”

Per-lender cap

The per-lender cap is, as we revealed here, a classic hedge fund manager trick put in place to eliminate risk while allowing the government to maintain its ideological position.

“Of course when we look at loans we work on a 60 per cent guarantee not 80 per cent and of course it makes it more difficult, and while we are taking the blame at the end of the day it is the government’s structure that is the real source of problems,” the anonymous executive said.

“If you want to get this done, you need to keep it simple and transparent and you need to get the cash out.”

We suspect the hedge fund chancellor will have to move the guarantee to 100 per cent sooner rather than later. 

Better still would be for him to stop trying to fix a scheme that was overly complex and broken from the beginning and start again with a simple offer of equity injection into companies or loans which convert into shares and all based on easy tests.  But hedge fund managers love complexity so we doubt this will happen.

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Tags: headline
Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending fromTLE

  • All
  • trending

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

Stress, fear and homelessness: The threat looming over families confronted with eviction

File photo dated 07/11/03 of a prison cell.

The Other Prison Pandemic

Latest from TLE

Mail On Sunday ordered to print front-page statement on Meghan’s copyright win

Heavy traffic in Westminster generates exhaust pollution in London.

UK guilty of breaching air pollution limits, European Court of Justice rules

Government ‘acted unlawfully’ by failing to publish over 500 Covid contracts in time – High Court

UK is ‘over’ – Welsh first minister’s damning comments on future of Union

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: jack@thelondoneconomic.com

Commercial enquiries, please contact: advertise@thelondoneconomic.com

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech & Auto
  • About The London Economic
  • Meet the Team
  • Privacy policy

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.