• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Business and Economics Business

In the business of Social Business

By Guy Dorrell Every turn of the economic cycle seems to bring another fad; 2007, just before the crash, saw food miles as the ‘must talk about’ subject of the moment. The idea that seafood should be fished from Scottish waters, shipped to Thailand for processing and then shipped back to Scotland for sale appeared […]

Joe Mellor by Joe Mellor
2014-05-28 07:54
in Business
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

By Guy Dorrell

Every turn of the economic cycle seems to bring another fad; 2007, just before the crash, saw food miles as the ‘must talk about’ subject of the moment. The idea that seafood should be fished from Scottish waters, shipped to Thailand for processing and then shipped back to Scotland for sale appeared absurd, because it was.

Then came the economic downturn, with the first run on a bank in 200 years, and food miles slipped down everyone’s agenda.

Since the global economic downturn, or most likely because of it, one topic that caught the public imagination but has managed to stick is Social Business.

Early beginnings

Perhaps it isn’t surprising that social business chimes with consumers. For millennia, all business was intrinsically social business. Marco Polo may have brought Oriental delights from China on the Silk Road, but the logistics making supermarkets, and so spelling the protracted demise of local businesses, really came of age in the 1970s and 80s.

Conversely, some of our most recognizable brands that benefited hugely in the explosion of the supermarket chain, have their roots as social business. Cadbury’s, Rowntree, Friends Provident, Barclays, even Sony have their roots as social businesses; and in their beginnings were social to a degree to which current social businesses have yet to aspire.

Welfare officers, the precursor to today’s Human Resources – but with genuine welfare for their workers as their purpose were a Quaker invention. Rowntree’s, a Quaker family-run business from York, were among the first to employ dedicated Welfare officers. Social and health campaigns were run by the company, as well as educational support, libraries and workers’ bands.

Each of the innovations were designed to make the workers feel a part of something bigger, something intrinsically social. Deborah Cadbury’s excellent ‘Chocolate Wars’ gives an account of the flourishing of her family’s famous company, from its roots as a small Quaker enterprise to global multinational.

RelatedPosts

Number of pubs shutting for good across England and Wales jumps 50%

The Range set to buy Wilko brand in £5m deal

How the great COVID resignation changed employee attraction & retention

Brexit could see Vauxhall abandon Luton after over 100 years

Fast forward 150 years and something similar, adapted to the 21st century, is happening. The appeal of social businesses, with their standards and mission, make them the choice of spending, as well as the choice of vocation, for a sizeable demographic.

Banker to the Poor

Muhammad Yunus, Nobel Laureate and founder of the Grameen Bank is credited with the first definition of social business. He defines them as businesses founded to serve a need to solve a social problem. A social business is one that seeks to make a profit, though not to pay out dividend. It’s easy to see, with tax evasion and market rigging a near-daily feature of the news, why this model appeals to so many.

Social businesses are springing up to serve markets that for multinationals it would scarcely be worth avoiding the tax on. They have the agility that multinationals say they value so much, but are seldom able to achieve. Take, for example, the story of Jenny Dawson.

In late 2010, hedge-fund employee Jenny took a trip to New Spitalfields Market. She saw the huge amounts of food going beyond date mark that were almost inevitable with any market. Waste, and her rejection of its inevitability sparked Jenny into creating a social business; Rubies in the Rubble.

Market forces

With a mission to use the fruit and vegetables that would otherwise just be thrown away, Rubies in the Rubble began producing chutneys. Doing the actual making, the chopping, cooking and bottling is a workforce comprising of disadvantaged people – who’ve also previously been treated largely as surplus to requirements.

Rubies in the Rubble’s catalogue of products is capricious; what doesn’t sell in the market today will become a preserve or a chutney tomorrow.

What is a constant is the purpose behind the enterprise, one that does not differ substantially from Muhammad Yunus’s foundations of the Grameen Bank in Chittagong in 1976.

Both of these social businesses created change through small scale manufacturing. Social retailing has hit the headlines recently with the opening of the UK’s first ever social supermarket.

Problems, and their solution, are the bedrock of social enterprise – clearly nobody would speculatively start a social business to feed consumerism. Retailing what other chains deem unsaleable, whether through labelling issues or imminent display until dates, is the model that the Community Shop has chosen.

Born as a social enterprise from parent company The Company Shop, Barnsley’s pilot store is paving the way for a national roll-out of similar stores. Each will serve a community where food poverty is a significant problem.

In addition to simple retailing, Community Shops run support programmes for customers, ranging from advice on budgeting to cookery classes. Plans for a initial supermarket in London are already well underway.

So the customers might be ethically-motivated purchasers of chutney from Waitrose, or they might be those on the edge of food poverty. But who works at them?

Rubies in the Rubble brings people together for the common social purpose, despite originating from polar opposites. From disadvantaged women based in the inner city, to Oxford graduates and former hedge-fund workers, they couldn’t be more disparate.

What is a growing theme is those who opt for working in a social enterprise, rather than working in big business. Research undertaken by the iOpener Institute shows that job fulfilment, the choice of enjoyment over pure financial gain is prevalent among those born after 1980 – the Generation Y cohort.

Combine the groundswell of consumers’ positive feelings towards social enterprises with the lack of choice and availability of roles for young people and new graduates, as well as the public disapproval of the tax affairs of large corporations and social businesses seem to be a fad that won’t fade.

Previous Post

Don’t blame Ashley…Blame Pardew

Next Post

Can anyone stop Rafael Nadal?

Please login to join discussion

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

More from TLE

Raab warns of ‘wafer-thin ice’ in UK-China relations after spy arrest

Monetisation on Russell Brand’s YouTube channel suspended

Thousands of new staff would ‘cut asylum backlog and end hotel and barge use’

‘Part time King’ Charles works just seven weeks in a year

Labour would seek ‘much better’ Brexit deal from Brussels – Starmer

Car industry ‘utterly furious’ with the government – sources

Serial killer gives terrifying warning to Piers Morgan when asked if he still has urges to kill

WATCH: TikTok influencer gets mad at Tube passengers for ‘ruining her shot’

Starmer compared to ‘zero balls’ Ken doll after ‘inaction man’ swipe at PM

Elon Musk suggests Twitter (X) paywall is imminent

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




-->