• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
    • Meet the Team
  • Contact us
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Opinion
  • Elevenses
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
  • Food
    • All Food
    • Recipes
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
  • JOBS
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Home Office ‘misunderstood’ immigration law, wrongly punishing refugees

The case is putting pressure on the Home Office to provide answers after labelling those convicted of the offence as “people smugglers” and claiming small boat crossings were illegal.

Andra Maciuca by Andra Maciuca
2021-12-22 08:11
in News, Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

The law has been “misunderstood” by the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to asylum seekers in small boats, the Court of Appeal has found.

The ruling was made while quashing the convictions of three men who were wrongly jailed for “assisting unlawful immigration” by steering dinghies, according to The Independent.

Judges concluded the Channel crossings are not illegal and that a legal “heresy” developed, prompting asylum seekers to think they had no defence to the charge.

The judgement read: “As the law presently stands, an asylum seeker who merely attempts to arrive at the frontiers of the United Kingdom in order to make a claim is not entering or attempting to enter the country unlawfully.

Asylum seekers ‘wrongly given detention notices’

“Even though an asylum seeker has no valid passport or identity document, or prior permission to enter the United Kingdom, this does not make his arrival at the port a breach of an immigration law.”

The case is putting pressure on the Home Office to provide answers after labelling those convicted of the offence as “people smugglers” and claiming small boat crossings were illegal.

Judges explained the actual law requirements were “not alive in the minds of the Border Force officers” dealing with the cases and that asylum seekers arriving in dinghies were wrongly given “notices of liability to detention”.

RelatedPosts

‘Radical, hopeful alternative’ needed to beat Tories – Corbyn

More than 100,000 sign up to Enough is Enough campaign in 24 hours

Thames Water to announce hosepipe ban imminently

Johnson ‘disgraceful’ for passing cost-of-living support to successor – Rayner

The judgement specified it was based on current law, but highlight the government’s attempt to change the law in order to prosecute asylum seekers for “arrivals”, not for “entries”.

The Nationality and Borders Bill would also raise the maximum sentence for assisting unlawful immigration to life, and illegal entries punishments would increase from six months to four years in prison.

Judges’ conclusion

The Court of Appeal considered the men were charged with facilitating unlawful entry to Britain after being filmed steering the small boats they travelled in – but concluded they did not commit the offence because they did not enter the UK.

The judgment read: “It appears that when drone technology enabled interception of the small boats at sea more regularly, and the number of small boats also greatly increased, criminal investigations and subsequent prosecutions were launched … without any careful analysis of the law and appropriate guidance to those conducting interviews, taking charging decisions, and presenting cases to courts.”

Judges also noted that the Immigration Act 1971, which was used to prosecute the men, was not a suitable law to use for the present immigration crisis.

They criticised the “flawed view” of what the law meant, which they said has been developing in courts working on such cases.

The Court of Appeal said there are currently seven other cases “raising similar points” scheduled for January, and demanded explanations from the CPS.

Related: France hits out at UK for ‘not taking its share of asylum seekers’

Tags: asylum seekersHome OfficeRefugees

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending on TLE

  • All
  • trending
Abdollah

‘Rescue us’: Afghan teacher begs UK to help him escape Taliban

CHOMSKY: “If Corbyn had been elected, Britain would be pursuing a much more sane course”

What If We Got Rid Of Prisons?

More from TLE

Man Utd & England star denies speeding after Bentley clocked at almost 20mph above speed limit

This tweet sums up Rees-Mogg’s religious hypocrisy perfectly

Restaurant Review – Heddon Street Kitchen

‘Sad, loser racists:’ Mastermind’s Clive Myrie pities racist trolls

Jeremy Corbyn says parts of media avoiding accusations Boris Johnson misused public money and abused power

Beer of the Week: Mikkeller American Dream India Pale Lager

Spirit of the Week: Don Papa Sevillana Cask Finish

Scottish parliament bosses urged to rethink using birds of prey to scare off pigeons

Coronavirus ‘currently eliminated’ in New Zealand

Film Review: First Man

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.