• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
      • Horoscopes
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Thunderball
      • Set For Life
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Home Office ‘misunderstood’ immigration law, wrongly punishing refugees

The case is putting pressure on the Home Office to provide answers after labelling those convicted of the offence as “people smugglers” and claiming small boat crossings were illegal.

Andra Maciuca by Andra Maciuca
2021-12-22 08:11
in News, Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

The law has been “misunderstood” by the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to asylum seekers in small boats, the Court of Appeal has found.

The ruling was made while quashing the convictions of three men who were wrongly jailed for “assisting unlawful immigration” by steering dinghies, according to The Independent.

Judges concluded the Channel crossings are not illegal and that a legal “heresy” developed, prompting asylum seekers to think they had no defence to the charge.

The judgement read: “As the law presently stands, an asylum seeker who merely attempts to arrive at the frontiers of the United Kingdom in order to make a claim is not entering or attempting to enter the country unlawfully.

Asylum seekers ‘wrongly given detention notices’

“Even though an asylum seeker has no valid passport or identity document, or prior permission to enter the United Kingdom, this does not make his arrival at the port a breach of an immigration law.”

The case is putting pressure on the Home Office to provide answers after labelling those convicted of the offence as “people smugglers” and claiming small boat crossings were illegal.

Judges explained the actual law requirements were “not alive in the minds of the Border Force officers” dealing with the cases and that asylum seekers arriving in dinghies were wrongly given “notices of liability to detention”.

The judgement specified it was based on current law, but highlight the government’s attempt to change the law in order to prosecute asylum seekers for “arrivals”, not for “entries”.

The Nationality and Borders Bill would also raise the maximum sentence for assisting unlawful immigration to life, and illegal entries punishments would increase from six months to four years in prison.

RelatedPosts

Tories ‘acting in interests’ of wealthiest as living costs soar – Corbyn

Man denied entry to baseball game after trying to take his ’emotional support alligator’

BBC release trailer of Steve Coogan as Jimmy Savile

Another one bites the dust: Calvin Robinson given the heave-ho by GB News

Judges’ conclusion

The Court of Appeal considered the men were charged with facilitating unlawful entry to Britain after being filmed steering the small boats they travelled in – but concluded they did not commit the offence because they did not enter the UK.

The judgment read: “It appears that when drone technology enabled interception of the small boats at sea more regularly, and the number of small boats also greatly increased, criminal investigations and subsequent prosecutions were launched … without any careful analysis of the law and appropriate guidance to those conducting interviews, taking charging decisions, and presenting cases to courts.”

Judges also noted that the Immigration Act 1971, which was used to prosecute the men, was not a suitable law to use for the present immigration crisis.

They criticised the “flawed view” of what the law meant, which they said has been developing in courts working on such cases.

The Court of Appeal said there are currently seven other cases “raising similar points” scheduled for January, and demanded explanations from the CPS.

Related: France hits out at UK for ‘not taking its share of asylum seekers’

Tags: asylum seekersHome OfficeRefugees
Previous Post

Met Police refers itself to watchdog over handling of No 10 Xmas party investigation

Next Post

Time to trust people, not scientists – Jacob Rees-Mogg

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

More from TLE

BBC release trailer of Steve Coogan as Jimmy Savile

Nandy rips Braverman’s multiculturalism claims to shreds on Question Time

Dan Wootton apology slapped with a communuty note on X

Dan Wootton sacked by the Daily Mail

Labour backs down on plan to end charitable status of private schools

The Boom of Superyacht Shipyards in Tarragona Versus Overcrowding in Mallorca

Prospective Areas for Fintech Investments

No need for ‘newt motel’ as Boris Johnson gets permission to build swimming pool

Elevenses: The Most Expensive White Elephant in UK History

Elton John and UN slam Braverman speech

JOBS

FIND MORE JOBS

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




← Met Police refers itself to watchdog over handling of No 10 Xmas party investigation ← Time to trust people, not scientists – Jacob Rees-Mogg
-->