• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Union criticises easyJet’s ‘sick’ proposals for job cuts

According to Balpa sickness will be used as a "key component" in choosing which 727 pilots will lose their jobs.

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
2020-07-11 07:38
in News
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

The pilots’ union has branded proposals by easyJet to use sick days as a factor when deciding who to axe as part of its wave of redundancies as “unnecessary and wrong”.

The British Airline Pilots’ Association (Balpa) said that the airline had told pilot representatives it intended to use sickness as a “key component” in choosing which 727 pilots will lose their jobs.

Its general secretary Brian Strutton warned that the plans could put flight safety at risk.

It is unnecessary and wrong that easyJet is intending to use sickness as a stick to beat its safety-critical staff. #SafetyCulture https://t.co/FNNnng4c3s

— BALPA (@BALPApilots) July 10, 2020

Unnecessary and wrong

He said: “It is unnecessary and wrong that easyJet is intending to use sickness as a stick to beat its safety-critical staff.

“EasyJet has in the past rightly encouraged pilots to report in sick or fatigued if they are unfit to fly – that is in everyone’s best interest.

“Now to turn around and say that doing the right thing means you may lose your job could have a chilling effect on the safety culture in easyJet from now on.

“Not only that, but the timeframe easyJet intend to use includes the early coronavirus period when some people were getting sick or having to shield themselves and their families.

“Should these people be punished by losing their jobs too?”

No justification

Mr Strutton said that the union was yet to see any justification for the scale of job losses proposed by easyJet and vowed to resist any move to use the cronavirus crisis to “undermine easyJet’s reputation as a decent employer”.

RelatedPosts

Gary Lineker says BBC should ‘hold its head in shame’ for not airing Gaza documentary

Donald Trump announces he plans to host UFC fight at the White House

BBC to stop showing ‘high risk’ performances after Bob Vylan Glastonbury controversy

Keir Starmer confirms Rachel Reeves will be Chancellor ‘for a very long time to come’

The Luton-based carrier announced in May that it intends to reduce its workforce by up to 30% as it cuts the size of its fleet due to the coronavirus pandemic, following similar moves by other airlines such as British Airways and Ryanair.

EasyJet has around 15,000 full-time employees – including 8,000 based in the UK – meaning a maximum of 4,500 jobs are at risk.

But a spokeswoman for the airline denied that sickness was a “key component” and said that absence was one of a number of criteria being put forward in the proposals.

Talks at an early stage

In a statement the firm added: “EasyJet is fully committed to working closely and constructively with Balpa throughout the consultation process.

“We have put forward initial proposals for discussion as our talks are at an early stage.

“We would never put forward proposals which would compromise safety as we have an industry-leading safety culture, as Balpa acknowledges.

“Safety is our number one priority and we are focused on doing what is right for the long-term health of the company and our people so we can protect jobs going forward.”

Related: Almost £5 billion of coronavirus bailouts handed out to firms based in tax havens

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← UK opts out of EU scheme on coronavirus vaccine purchase ← Investigation reveals fresh cash for honours scandal
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->