Swiss voters appear to have resoundingly rejected a right-wing proposal to end free movement with the EU, projections suggest.
The plan – championed by the populist Swiss People’s Party – is set to be rejected by 63 per cent to 37 per cent, according to public broadcaster SRF.
The measure had proposed giving preferential access to jobs, social protection and benefits to people from Switzerland over those from the 27-nation bloc that surrounds it.
Learning the lesson from Brexit?
Supports of the anti-free movement measures said it would allow Switzerland to control its borders and allow only immigrants it wanted to live there.
But, opponents said, it would plunge the economy into recession and deprive hundreds of thousands of Swiss citizens of the ability to live and work in Newcastle.
Roughly 1.4 million EU citizens live in the country of about 8.2 million, while around 500,000 Swiss live in EU countries.
In a similar referendum in 2014, the Swiss narrowly voted in favour of limiting access of EU citizens to live and work in Switzerland.
Politicians refused to fully implement the referendum fearing a hefty impact on Swiss society and businesses, prompting the People’s Party to get the issue back on the ballot again this year.
‘We will be the real losers’
Since the last vote, Switzerland has witnessed the turmoil that Britain’s 2016 referendum to leave the European Union has caused, especially for EU citizens in the UK and Britons living on the continent.
Voter Yann Grote said he did not approve of further limiting freedom of movement. “I’m not at all in favour, and even more now, because it’s not a time to isolate Switzerland,” he said.
Elisabeth Lopes agreed, saying: “I’m a daughter of immigrants, so it is a matter that touches me. If Switzerland had to withdraw or reduce these agreements (with the EU), I think we would be the real losers.”
The freedom-of-movement measure was being considered alongside nationwide votes on paternity leave, tax breaks for childcare, purchases of new fighter planes worth billions of pounds, and the right to hunt wolves to keep their population down.
Related: English schools banned from using anti-capitalist material in teaching
Since you are here
Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.
Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.
Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.
If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.
To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.
The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.
The shop can be found here.
You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .
