• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Guest Content
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Elevenses
  • Business
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Property
  • JOBS
  • All
    • All Entertainment
    • Film
    • Sport
    • Tech/Auto
    • Lifestyle
    • Lottery Results
      • Lotto
      • Set For Life
      • Thunderball
      • EuroMillions
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
NEWSLETTER
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Centre for Brexit Studies statement completely debunks government’s position on customs union

A statement released by the Centre for Brexit Studies has today completely ridiculed Theresa May’s position on the customs union. The Prime Minister has ruled out a customs union with the EU in what has been described as a significant departure from previous policy. Whilst previous policy effectively ruled out membership of the European Union Customs […]

Jack Peat by Jack Peat
2018-02-05 18:31
in News, Politics
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmailWhatsapp

A statement released by the Centre for Brexit Studies has today completely ridiculed Theresa May’s position on the customs union.

The Prime Minister has ruled out a customs union with the EU in what has been described as a significant departure from previous policy.

Whilst previous policy effectively ruled out membership of the European Union Customs Union (EUCU), it did not rule out membership of a customs union with the EU.

Indeed, during Theresa May’s speech of 17th January 2017 when she set out Britain’s negotiating positions (the so-called “12 points”), it was stated that “I do want us to have a customs agreement with the EU”.

A bilateral customs agreement, such as the EU-Turkey “customs union”, for example, though, does not cover agriculture or services, nor does it affect procurement. It does, however, levy a common external tariff on goods (with provisions allowing for derogations in certain circumstances).

However, Theresa May’s latest statement has also appeared to rule out an arrangement like this.

In response to the move, Professor Alex de Ruyter, Director of Birmingham City University’s Centre for Brexit Studies, said: “This implies that even if the UK were to completely align its regulatory standards with the EU, the EU would still have to impose customs checks upon goods entering via the UK. This is not a negotiating position: it is physically impossible for the EU to avoid customs checks if the UK has an FTA with a country that the EU does not.

“More importantly, at first blush it appears that Downing Street’s latest statement is in direct contradiction to what was agreed in December during stage one of the negotiations between the UK and EU. In particular, the UK stated that the UK “respects Ireland’s […] place in the Internal Market and Customs Union” and that it “remains committed to […] its guarantee of avoiding a hard border”. It is unclear how Ireland can avoid imposing a customs barrier if the UK enters into an FTA with a third party.

“Moreover, the UK explicitly stated that, “In the absence of agreed solutions, the United Kingdom will maintain full alignment with those rules of the Internal Market and the Customs Union which, now or in the future, support North-South cooperation, the all-island economy and the protection of the 1998 Agreement.” This appears incompatible with the aim of leaving the EUCU and avoiding any kind of customs union with the EU.

RelatedPosts

Bernie Sanders slams Netanyahu amid White House visit

Government emergency alert test to be held within months – date announced

MPs vote to make Premier League matches free to air

Ed Davey urges Keir Starmer to use Macron state visit to ‘show united front’ against Trump’s trade war

“Thus, the PM’s latest statement still appears to leave the UK Government in the situation of wanting to “have its cake and eat it too”.”

RELATED 

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/theresa-mays-customs-union-u-turn-economically-ludicrous-breach-good-friday-agreement/05/02/

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Commercial enquiries, please contact: [email protected]

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

← Film Review: The Cloverfield Paradox ← Labour will take no lessons from a system that “checks your purse before it checks your pulse” 
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Lottery Results
    • Lotto
    • Set For Life
    • Thunderball
    • EuroMillions
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Travel
  • JOBS
  • More…
    • Elevenses
    • Opinion
    • Property
    • Tech & Auto
  • About Us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact us

© The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE thelondoneconomic.com - All Rights Reserved. Privacy

-->