Why an inequality busting “maximum wage” is both economically viable and politically practical

A maximum wage could be both economically viable and politically practical, a leading analyst has claimed.

With minimum wages well established in many countries around the world, new research suggests capping income could create “a world without a super rich” and reduce the gap between the rich and poor.

The paper comes hot on the heels of Resolution Foundation research that found the UK’s wealth gap has been widening over the past decade.

The think tank estimates 1 per cent of adults, some 488,000 people, own 14 per cent of the nation’s assets – worth about £11 trillion.

At the other end of the financial scale, 15 per cent (7.3 million people) either own no assets at all, or are in debt.

Sam Pizzigati, author of The Case for a Maximum Wage, says: “Modern societies set limits, on everything from how fast motorists can drive to how much waste factory owners can dump in our rivers.

“But incomes in our deeply unequal world have no limits.

“Many of our largest corporations pay their executives more in a morning than their workers can earn in a year.

“Capping top incomes could tackle our rising inequality more effectively than conventional approaches to narrowing our vast economic divides”.

The notion certainly has political appeal in some parts of the spectrum, with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn championing proposals of a maximum wage following Fat Cat Wednesday.

Speaking on the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he said: “”I would like there to be some kind of high earnings cap, quite honestly…I can’t put a figure on it.

“The point I’m trying to make…is that we have the worst levels of income disparity of most of the OECD countries in this country. It’s getting worse and corporate taxation is a part of it.

“If we want to live in a more egalitarian society and fund our public services we cannot go on creating worse levels of inequality.”

RELATED 

The Brexit assessments the Government didn’t want released have been published – now everyone can see what they were hiding

Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.


Donate Now Button

Related Posts

As Tories quibble amongst each other, this is what’s happening on the streets of Britain
The ERG have strengthened May’s hand by calling for a vote of no confidence
Lawyer speaks out over BBC bias against Corbyn as evidence of “coded negative imagery” emerges

Leave a Reply