• Privacy policy
  • T&C’s
  • FAQ
  • Meet the Team
  • About The London Economic
  • Advertise
TLE ONLINE SHOP!
NEWSLETTER
SUPPORT THE LONDON ECONOMIC
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
  • TLE
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Food
  • Lifestyle
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech/Auto
No Result
View All Result
The London Economic
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Tribal Britain: The government needs it, we don’t

The exploitation of resentment and selfishness has become central to politics in Britain today.

Guest Contributor by Guest Contributor
June 3, 2020
in Opinion

By John Simms

The government bears ultimate responsibility for the state of the nation right? If we emerge from the Coronavirus crisis blaming each other and not the government’s poor response it will be a new low for British tribalism. The sad thing is, they really want us to do exactly that. It will be a sad state of affairs, a government that has somehow managed to shirk responsibility for, well,  everything by exploiting us and our resentment. Resentment that originates with their failures. 

What began as subtle linguistic manipulation of the electorate has become a one track minded approach of divide and conquer. Having come to rely on blame and the exploitation of resentment as their principle methodology they find themselves in a crisis for which they are plainly responsible and they are struggling to find a convincing response.

The Cameron coalition government

To find the origin of this strategy, re-wind 8 years to the Cameron coalition government. David Cameron was heavily influenced by the psychology of voter manipulation, he formed his “nudge unit” with the goal of influencing the public without them really realising. A small “nudge” in the right direction is more effective than forcing someone. Cameron’s use of language and exploiting our selfish motivations was key to getting popular assent to his government’s austerity measures. He repeatedly brought up the idea of “fairness” in the context of benefits, he allowed voters to feel hard done by, that things were somehow unfair and they needed to be fixed. It worked with great success. 

As any reasonable person might ask, surely any problems with the welfare system are the government’s fault? A 2013 study primarily investigating how they gained popular consent for austerity found that people are far more likely to blame and resent those they meet day to day than the government.  There was a powerful belief in a loss of community and a degradation of society amongst people, a serious element of bitterness, a strong theme of “us and them”. Common scapegoats were the vulnerable, single parents, the disabled and the unemployed. This manifested itself in a serious uptick in resentment towards the vulnerable, the Guardian reported in 2012 that there was a discernible increase in hate crimes and public harassment of the disabled as a result of the government narrative. 

Resentment and selfishness

The exploitation of resentment and selfishness has become so central to politics in today’s Britain that it was pretty much the sole deciding factor in the last election. It was easy and required minimal effort. The current administration plans who to blame even before planning what to do, as if there is an assumption that failure is inevitable. Health workers are blamed for “overusing” PPE, experts are blamed for their “bad” advice, the media are blamed for talking about Dominic Cummings. New guidance from the government urging us to “use our common sense” is an unsubtle attempt to make us blame groups we harbour resentment towards. We can now blame the young, the poor, immigrants or any other other convenient group for breaching social distancing.

The government’s determined exercise in not being responsible for anything at all creates an interesting logical dilemma. They portray themselves as an unfortunate entity, dependent on the judgement and advice of others and removed from responsibility for their own decisions. If this is really the case, what are they for? 

RelatedPosts

Building a Super Life Science Industry will be vital for UK to navigate the challenges of Brexit

Thoughts turn to UK as Trump administration ends

Donald Trump is gone. What next?

We should take time to understand anti-vaxxer’s concerns, rather than just condemn them

Related: “I’m not the architect of my misfortune” – why white people should be asking what racism means to them

Since you are here

Since you are here, we wanted to ask for your help.

Journalism in Britain is under threat. The government is becoming increasingly authoritarian and our media is run by a handful of billionaires, most of whom reside overseas and all of them have strong political allegiances and financial motivations.

Our mission is to hold the powerful to account. It is vital that free media is allowed to exist to expose hypocrisy, corruption, wrongdoing and abuse of power. But we can't do it without you.

If you can afford to contribute a small donation to the site it will help us to continue our work in the best interests of the public. We only ask you to donate what you can afford, with an option to cancel your subscription at any point.

To donate or subscribe to The London Economic, click here.

The TLE shop is also now open, with all profits going to supporting our work.

The shop can be found here.

You can also SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER .

Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism Support fearless, free, investigative journalism

Subscribe to our Newsletter

View our  Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Trending fromTLE

  • All
  • trending

Stress, fear and homelessness: The threat looming over families confronted with eviction

File photo dated 07/11/03 of a prison cell.

The other prison pandemic

Credit;PA

Repressionomics: Get ready for the new permanent austerity

Latest from TLE

National Lottery Lotto Results – Saturday 23rd January 2021

thunder ball results

Thunder Ball Results, Saturday 23rd January 2021

UK records 1,348 more Covid-19 deaths in last 24 hours

Hundreds of Russians arrested in mass protests for Navalny’s release

About Us

TheLondonEconomic.com – Open, accessible and accountable news, sport, culture and lifestyle.

Read more

Address

The London Economic Newspaper Limited t/a TLE
Company number 09221879
International House,
24 Holborn Viaduct,
London EC1A 2BN,
United Kingdom

Contact

Editorial enquiries, please contact: jack@thelondoneconomic.com

Commercial enquiries, please contact: advertise@thelondoneconomic.com

SUPPORT

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing and support real, independent, investigative journalism.

DONATE & SUPPORT

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.




No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • Lifestyle
  • Food
  • Property
  • Travel
  • Tech & Auto
  • About The London Economic
  • Meet the Team
  • Privacy policy

© 2019 thelondoneconomic.com - TLE, International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN. All Rights Reserved.