Theresa May and Amber Rudd suppress Westminster child abuse documents for national security reasons


Labour MP Lisa Nandy just revealed in parliament the embarrassing inconsistencies between Prime Minister Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd over documents being hidden from the inquiry into allegations of child abuse by MP Cyril Smith.

“The Home Secretary told me that some papers would be withheld from the Cyrill Smith inquiry for national security reasons,” Nandy told the House of Commons, yet she added: “this week the Prime Minister has written to me to say we are clear that the work of the security services will not prevent information being shared with other such inquiries.”

– And she challenged Amber Rudd to confirm “for the survivors of Cyril Smith who have waited for decades” for justice – whether papers on historic allegations of child abuse against Smith will be withheld from inquiries for reasons of national security.


"Child Abuse documents can't be released 'for national security'

BREAKING Parliamentary news: Lisa Nandy: "I was told documents on MP Cyril Smith's child abuse couldn't be released 'for National Security reasons'…"

Posted by The London Economic on Monday, 20 November 2017

Cyril Smith was a Liberal MP for Rochdale in the 1970’s after Liberal Party leader Jeremy Thorpe – who later resigned amid sexual scandal – insisted the local party have Smith as a candidate even though police had investigated serious allegations of sexual abuse of young boys in care homes in Rochdale where he had been Mayor.

The police investigation was dropped in 1970. Smith died in 2010 and two years later the Crown Prosecution Service admitted that he would have faced prosecution for allegations of child abuse where he still alive with allegations that had surfaced since.

The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse last month heard how Smith was a governor at several schools in Rochdale, including Knowl View, where one abuse survivor attended as a boy when Smith was governor. He gave horrific testimony of a rape by Smith.

Cyril Smith

The inquiry is investigating historic abuse in Rochdale schools and care homes and heard how police had warned that Smith had “used his unique position to indulge in a sordid series of indecent episodes with young boys towards whom he had a special responsibility.”

The inquiry was provided evidence by MI5 that the security service had been aware at the time that the Director of Public Prosecutions had lied to journalists about not charging the MP, saying a case hadn’t been referred to them.  MI5 appear to have not pursued this serious allegation as their role was “to defend the realm”, the inquiry heard.

A police report into Smith when he stood for election in 1970 read: “he has used his unique position to indulge in a sordid series of indecent episodes with young boys towards whom he had a special responsibility.”

The inquiry also heard that Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher would have been likely to be aware of the allegations against Cyril Smith when she awarded him a knighthood in 1988.

Lead counsel Brian Altman QC told the inquiry: “It is important to bear in mind the extent to which Cyril Smith continued to involve himself in serious issues related to the welfare of children. A knighthood would only have reinforced Smith’s veneer of respectability and power.”

By Benjamin Jenkins


Theresa May accused of ignoring THREE warnings that party whips “used information about sexual abuse to demand loyalty from MPs”

Was Tory PM Ted Heath a serial paedophile – and what happened to the boys on his boat?

Jersey child abuse inquiry: original whistleblowers say abusers still at large

Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.

Donate Now Button

Related Posts

Derby city centre rocked by series of huge explosions
Diane Abbott caught drinking M&S ‘tinny’ on London Overground – Twitter reacts
fume event
Pilots and crew from five airlines launch legal battles to make cabin air safe to breathe: what is at stake?

13 Responses

  1. Bee Warren

    Because national security really depends on kiddy fiddlers being allowed to get off scot free… How does that figure exactly?

  2. julie

    oh for goodness sake! I am surprised that anyone is surprised that this was going on…and is still going on. If you are a victim of sexual abuse, your experience is NOT unusual. It is just made to seem that way by the people who perpetrate it – as in, those in positions of power. Who are (suprise surprise), usually older white males who have a bit of money, a bit of authority and not much else going on between their ears or their…podcasts. Period.

  3. Pat Mc Ginley

    Liar May is the most deceitful leader of the CONs in decades. Therefore, the ideal leader of the heartless, callous CONs. When she was Home Secretary she said the VIP paedophilia was “just the tip of the iceberg”, then quickly joined in the cover-up. One hundred and fourteen Home Office files on VIP paedophilia went “missing”. UK state broadcaster BBC used a Panorama program to demonise the victims as ‘liars’ while the other UK puppet media demonised the victims as ‘fantasist’s’. Then, a farcical succession of three ‘top’ judges and a farcical, phantom ‘inquiry’, Then, nothing. Welcome to ‘justice’ UK style!

  4. Jasper

    The excuse of protecting ‘National Security’ should be rephrased as ‘Their security’. The Hollie Greig affair came close to knocking the lid off the cover ups, but they all colluded to hush it up. Even the most maverick of MP’s wouldn’t talk about.

    The question is why, would it have exposed something even more nefarious ?

    Ask your MP if they have watched their copy of the Jo Cox video that they have just received.

Leave a Reply