George Osborne and David Cameron laugh at Spending Review

Conservatives accused of “economic murder” in landmark study which links 120k deaths to austerity

The harsh austerity plan rolled out under consecutive Conservative governments has been linked to 120,000 deaths in Britain.

According to a damning landmark study there were 45,000 more deaths in the first four years of Tory-led efficiencies than would have been expected if funding had stayed at pre-election levels.

On this trajectory that could rise to nearly 200,000 excess deaths by the end of 2020.

The study, published in BMJ Open today, identified that mortality rates in the UK had declined steadily from 2001 to 2010, but this reversed sharply with the death rate growing again after austerity came in.

From this reversal the authors identified that 45,368 extra deaths occurred between 2010 and 2014, than would have been expected, although it stops short of calling them “avoidable”.

Based on those trends it predicted the next five years – from 2015 to 2020 – would account for 152,141 deaths – 100 a day – findings which one of the authors likened to “economic murder”.

The papers’ senior author and a researcher at UCL, Dr Ben Maruthappu, said that while the paper “can’t prove cause and effect” it shows an association.

“When you look at Portugal and other countries that have gone through austerity measures, they have found that health care provision gets worse and health care outcomes get worse,” he told The Independent.

Co-author Professor Lawrence King of the Applied Health Research Unit at Cambridge University added: “It is now very clear that austerity does not promote growth or reduce deficits – it is bad economics, but good class politics.

“This study shows it is also a public health disaster. It is not an exaggeration to call it economic murder.”

The Department of Health stressed that this study cannot be used to draw any firm conclusions about the cause of excess deaths.

In a statement, it said: “The NHS is treating more people than ever before and funding is at record levels with an £8bn increase by 2020-21. We’ve also backed adult social care with £2bn investment and have 12,700 more doctors and 10,600 more nurses on our wards since May 2010.”


The banks have paid back the cash – so why is the government still imposing austerity?

“I am so disappointed with Jeremy Corbyn”-Mhairi Black attacks Labour Leader with a more radical SNP programme of reversing austerity

Austerity Britain – Homeless person dealing with cold…by living in a fridge 

Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.

Donate Now Button

Related Posts

BREAKING: Bookmakers suspend bets on a general election following large bets
Brexit delay splits Tory Party, but who wants to use split to replace May?
Victims of slavery and trafficking ‘almost doubled to 7,000 in just two years’

2 Responses

  1. Goldeneagle

    It`s a disgrace that people have to suffer because this Government just don`t care about people, children, babies. Get your act together and stop lining your own pockets. I wish we had an army that would rise up and kick them out. The queen stands by and does nothing, when she could. She knows exactly what`s going on in this country. She has the power to dissolve Parliament and she does nothing. i`m so off the Royalty, spending while the country starves.

Leave a Reply