Caroline Lucas and People’s Vote win plaudits following live Brexit debate

Caroline Lucas, arguing in favour of a People’s Vote in a live Brexit debate broadcast on Channel 4, looks to have walked away with the plaudits after a fiercely contested battle with senior politicians.

The Green MP lined up against Jacob Rees-Mogg, who campaigned for a hard Brexit, James Cleverly, who was backing Theresa May’s deal, and Labour MP Barry Gardiner who called for a General Election in the debate, which replaced the Prime Minister’s head-to-head with Jeremy Corbyn after the respective parties failed to agree on the format.

Lucas took aim at Labour for backing a “project of the right, for the right”.

She also warmed Rees-Mogg that Brexit “is not a parlour game or debating society”, adding: “These are real people with real lives”

Following a warm reaction from the live audience a flurry of support has surfaced on social media, with former Labour spin doctor Alastair Campbell saying she “absolutely owned the Brexit debate” on Twitter.

Others praised her “common sense” approach saying she was “the only grown up in the room”.


Brexit Betrayal march vastly outnumbered by Stop Tommy Robinson counter march

Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.

Donate Now Button

Related Posts

Calls for General Election as Theresa May announces departure date
Top North East candidate for Brexit Party lives in…. France
Philip Alston accuses Amber Rudd of trying to “distract” from troubling human rights findings

Leave a Reply