Biggest scandal in history, why isn’t the mainstream press reporting it?

This is potentially the largest corporate scandal in history, but it hasn’t been widely reported

This is a story of deception on an unimaginable scale, but the UK mainstream media has been strangely mute.

This year average global temperatures continued to break records. Devastating flooding, mud slides and forest fires were seen throughout the world. Simultaneous harvest failures occurred in several key regions. Glacier melts continue at alarming rates, and the largest split in the Antarctic ice shelf left the shelf at it’s lowest extent ever recorded.

In the last week alone, super hurricanes wiped out several Caribbean islands. We still don’t know the full extent of the damage or loss of life.

Despite the climate phenomenon, nobody appears to be joining the dots. Perhaps President Trump and his administration (loaded with supporters of the fossil fuel industry and climate change deniers) have done their job. Successfully and baselessly discrediting the overwhelming global science enough to buy the fossil fuel industry another couple of decades perhaps?

However, in the midst of the freak weather, last week a Harvard Study uncovered what, if proved correct, would be corporate deception on an unimaginable scale. The researchers claimed that ExxonMobil has ‘Misled’ public on Climate Change for 40 Years.

They found a “systematic, quantifiable discrepancy” between what the oil giant said about climate change in private versus what it told the public.

Oil company deception over climate change

In the peer reviewed study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, Harvard researchers analysed hundreds of documents related to Exxon Mobil’s climate change communications. They found the company had continually made ‘explicit factual misrepresentations’ about global warming in advertisements aimed at the general public (many taken out in national newspaper advertorials), while simultaneously acknowledging its risks in private.

Study authors Naomi Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran wrote in the New York Times ‘Our findings are clear: Exxon Mobil misled the public about the state of climate science and its implications’.

‘Available documents show a systematic, quantifiable discrepancy between what Exxon Mobil’s scientists and executives discussed about climate change in private and in academic circles, and what it presented to the general public.’

ExxonMobil is the world’s largest oil company and the world’s seventh largest company by revenue. It was the second most profitable company in the Fortune 500 in 2014. It has a lot to lose if the public demands a more sustainable future.

If true, this would represent a corporate scandal on an immeasurable scale. The Tobacco health deception (and other scandals from the tobacco industry) would pale into insignificance in comparison to knowingly destroying the home of every living microbe for profit’s sake. Yet, the media is largely silent on the issue.

Advertorials in national newspapers softening, misrepresenting, or questioning climate science

The research shows that during the last two and a half decades in particular, whilst ExxonMobil was internally collating evidence that ‘points towards a discernible human influence on global climate’, it was simultaneously taking out advertorials in national newspapers softening, misrepresenting, or questioning climate science.

These revelations represent exceptionally bad news for ExxonMobil, who this year filed a lawsuit desperately seeking to block climate change fraud investigations by the attorneys general of Massachusetts and New York.

Last year, shareholders filed a class-action lawsuit against the company, alleging it misled its investors by failing to disclose the risks posed by climate change.

According to the lawsuit filed in a Texas federal court, investors claim they’ve been paying inflated prices for Exxon stock because the company knew, at the time, the value of its oil reserves was less than it was reporting to investors [pledges made in the Paris climate agreement, which the US was tied to until 2022, would ultimately limit oil production].

The lawsuit states ‘Exxon has long understood the negative effects of climate change and global warming and their relation to the worldwide use of hydrocarbons…  Exxon understood and appreciated that it was highly likely that it would not be able to extract all of its hydrocarbon reserves and those assets were ‘stranded.’ Yet Exxon publicly represented that none of its assets were ‘stranded’ because the impacts of climate change, if any, were uncertain and far off in the future.’

Even in light of the shareholder action, ExxonMobil continues to support climate disinformation and oppose sensible climate and energy policies through its leadership in the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), other lobbying groups, and trade associations like the American Petroleum Institute.

Trump, Russia and the Paris Climate Agreement

Despite the potential scale of allegations against ExxonMobil, the Federal Climate Investigation is in real danger of being taken into the long grass thanks to President Trump’s administration.

Last year the CEO of ExxonMobil, Rex Tillerson, was nominated as Secretary of State by President-elect Donald Trump, whilst Senator Jeff Sessions, Trump’s choice as attorney general, is a vocal opponent of investigating the oil giant for climate fraud. Several other top cabinet picks are cosy with, or heavily invested in the oil industry, making serious investigation into Exxon’s alleged climate deception likely to meet many obstacles.

The picture becomes even murkier when considering the alleged Russian influence on the US election. Together with the US, Russia is another non-OPEC nation dependent upon oil revenue for power and survival. Both have a vested interest in supporting the fossil fuel industry.

Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement this year caused widespread condemnation, even, publicly, from ExxonMobil. Yet, with no Paris targets to meet, ExxonMobil’s alleged overstatement of oil reserve values no longer holds true, at least in the short term. Trump has handed ExxonMobil a get out of jail free card.

The appointment of so many oil friendly bodies within Trump’s administration points to the fact that the overwhelming majority of climate scientists, warning about the unfolding threats to our planet, face an uphill struggle to be heard.

ExxonMobil, like other major fossil fuel companies, maintains a business model that aggressively invests in future reserves and a heavy long-term reliance on fossil fuels. Even by its own projections, this will lead to continued high carbon emissions, driving increases in global average temperatures to increase 3-4 degrees Celsius this century, leading to catastrophic climate change.

It’s time for the shareholders and the public to step up, shake off the apathy and demand that Trump cannot change the agenda away from the future of our planet. Our home must take priority over profits going into the pockets of fossils. It is the responsibility of the media to lead the revolt and expose the misinformation for what it is – Oil PR.


Watch – Warming ocean floor threat to creatures living in the seas around Antarctica


Featured image by Office of the President-elect –, CC BY 4.0,

Related Posts

Boris Johnson
Boris Johnson could be prosecuted for misconduct in public office over lies Britain gives £350m to the EU per week.
Will the ‘Special Relationship’ bring Britain into Trump’s war on Iran?
General Election
#DeniedMyVote: EU citizens trying to vote in EU Elections report voter denial

2 Responses

  1. Binkley

    Great writing – full of nicely hidden assumptions and completely devoid of facts. Like how much of the greenhouse effect is due to 380 ppm carbon dioxide, how the climate has been much more extreme – both hot and cold – in the past thousand years before hydrocarbons were in use. And attack Exxon – but not all her friends who want to turn CO2 and CH4 into liquid fuels and turn the agriculture of the world to growing fuel instead of food. So if CO2 is a significant driver of the greenhouse effect, creating an economy based on extraction should… bring on an ice age. Because who will tell these righteous know-it-alls when to stop?

  2. Diana Elliott

    Previous comment from Blinkley is dangerous in view of massive death tolls from Hurricanes and 1000s killed in India as the Monsoon seems to be more extreme than they can cope with. Media not headlining the unfolding catastrophe in India which again further evidence for climate change.

    Scientists have no doubt these catastrophes linked to increasing CO2. Just look at the evidence. Way back in 70s & 80s scientists collected ice core samples from the Antarctic. The layers of ice have formed over 1000s of years. The scientists bore a hole into the ice. These giant ‘popsicle’ like samples of ice provide data of the earth’s atmosphere over 1000s of years. Trapped in the ice are air bubbles. Samples of earth’s atmosphere from 1000s of years. The data shows exponential growth in CO2 since the industrial revolution. Oil companies very good at propaganda as they have such huge wealth which most of it is not in banks.

    The bank crisis was caused by people employed after 9/11. The Saudis planned the bank crisis. Bin Laden was an Oxford University graduate in economics. The plan was to destroy credit for development of alternatives to fossil fuels.

Leave a Reply