Air pollution in urban areas is that toxic people will need to leave to live longer

Slashing air pollution in urban areas to levels found in the countryside could add years to the lives of city dwellers, a new study found.

It would give men between one and two years extra and women six months to a year in Copenhagen, a population of over 616,000 people similar in size to Bristol or Belfast.

And they will have less illnesses such as cardiovascular disease and asthma.

But if air pollution was reduced by a fifth the result is an increased average lifespan of between three to six months.

Diesel engines pump out nitrogen dioxide or NO2, along with minute soot particles.

Previous studies have linked this particle pollution to an increased risk of diseases like lung cancer, respiratory diseases and cardiovascular diseases.

So University of Copenhagen scientists looked at levels of NO2 as an indicator of local smog.

And it found if air quality in the capital was similar to the countryside by 2040, they would have a longer lifespan.

Associate Professor Henrik Brønnum-Hansen from the Department of Public Health said: ”

‘An important point of the new study is that you do not just get one more year to live, you also get more years without disease.

“So it is not just a question of the average lifespan, but also of quality of life.

“Of course this reveals to the decision-makers the potential if they were to really do something about the air pollution.

“Copenhageners can live longer lives, because fewer would get sick and die from diseases which we know are caused by air pollution, among other things”

The study used advanced models named ‘DYNAMO-HIA’ to simulate the effect of air pollution on the population.

It used data from large population surveys on health, pollution calculations for the individual streets based on traffic patterns and register data regarding address, contact with the hospitals and mortality.

The traditional method for evaluating health effects underestimates the effect of traffic so researchers painted a much more precise picture by looking at NO2, which is closely connected to all health effects in Danish surveys, even though some of the effects are caused by particles.

The level of pollution in Copenhagen is approximately three times as high as the level measured at a measuring station just outside the city of Roskilde.

The annual mean NO2 concentration was 19.6 μg/m3 and for 70 per cent of the population the range of exposure was between 15 and 21 μg/m3.

If NO2 exposure was reduced to the annual mean rural level of 6 μg/m3, life expectancy in 2040 would increase by one year.

In addition to living longer, residents will be more disease free.

The greatest gain in disease-free life expectancy would be lifetime without ischemic heart disease (1.4 years), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.5 years for men and 1.6 years for women), and asthma (1.3 years for men and 1.5 years for women).

Co-author Professor Steffen Loft said: “Of course our scenario is ambitious, because it more or less requires all polluting vehicles to be removed from Copenhagen.

“But if you want to prevent a large number of cases of disease and increase the average lifespan by an entire year, you need to do something drastic – and 2040 is way into the future, so it is not unrealistic.”

Prof Brønnum-Hansen added: “The conclusion of the study was that lowering the NO2 exposure by reducing traffic-related air pollution would reduce incidence and prevalence of major chronic cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic diseases and lung cancer, and increase disease-free life expectancy.

“The full potential of health gain by reducing NO2 exposure level to that of rural areas would increase life expectancy in Copenhagen between one and two years for men and between a half year and one year for women.

“These results combined with previously recognised negative health effects of noise from road traffic are relevant to take account of in planning of future urban traffic.”

The study was published in the journal Environment International.


Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.

Donate Now Button

1 Response

  1. Air pollution cover-up not new:

    Here’s my letter sent 14 November 2018 in response to “Government’s air pollution plans a shambles, warns lawyers’ group”, by Matthew Taylor, Guardian, 13 November 2018, page 19

    “Dear Sir,

    The government’s air pollution plans might become less of “a shambles” (Guardian, 13 November 2018) if Client Earth’s November 2017 call to the EFRA Committee for “joined up thinking across (government) departments” had been heeded.

    Successive governments have known for almost two centuries that air pollution shortens lives, but ignored the truth behind the statistics and blamed poverty, or low socioeconomic status (SES), as can be seen in my November 2017 submission to the EFRA Committee.

    Dr William Brend, who was both barrister and medical doctor, had shown beyond any reasonable doubt that air pollution was the dominant causal factor for infant mortality and that poverty couldn’t be blamed in “Health and The State” (Constable, 1917), the entire text of which is online if Katie Nield or any other Client Earth lawyer wishes to easily check what was in the public domain over a century ago.

    Infant mortality rates (IMRs) are sensitive to air pollution and ONS data show sudden rises in IMRs in Councils exposed to emissions after incinerators started operating.

    The closure of Ironbridge Power Station in late November 2015 was followed by a 65% reduction in Telford & Wrekin’s infant mortality rate from 6.8 per 1,000 live births in 2015 to 2.4 per 1,000 in 2016 (ONS data). No upgrade in Telford’s SES has been reported and neither has the drop in infant deaths.

    Yours faithfully,

    Michael Ryan

    Entire text of Health & The State at:

    My EFRA Submission:

Leave a Reply